Product comparison · 2 portable stereo systems

Philips AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog vs Philips AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital

25specifications compared
12differ
13identical
13known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog has 3 W more RMS rated power than the Philips AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital (5 W vs 2 W). The Philips AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog has 48 mm more package width than the Philips AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital (310 mm vs 262 mm). The Philips AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog has 16 mm more package depth than the Philips AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital (175 mm vs 159 mm). Tuner type: Analog on the Philips AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog, Analog & digital on the Philips AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital. Supported radio bands: FM on the Philips AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog, DAB, DAB+, FM on the Philips AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital.

Tuner type
- AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog:Analog
- AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital:Analog & digital
Supported radio bands
- AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog:FM
- AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital:DAB, DAB+, FM
RMS rated power
- AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog:5 W
- AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital:2 W
AC input voltage
- AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog:220 V
- AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital:100 - 240 V
Package width
- AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog:310 mm
- AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital:262 mm
Package depth
- AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog:175 mm
- AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital:159 mm
Package height
- AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog:272 mm
- AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital:244 mm
Package weight
- AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog:2.2 kg
- AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital:1.9 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AZ1068/51, AZB200/12
38 specifications	A Philips AZ1068/51 portable stereo system Analog Model AZ1068/51 View product	B Philips AZB200/12 portable stereo system Analog & digital Model AZB200/12 View product
Radio2 differ
Tuner typeDiffers	Analog	Analog & digital
Supported radio bandsDiffers	FM	DAB, DAB+, FM
Auto digital tuningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Loudspeakers1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers	5 W	2 W
Number of built-in speakersKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Displayidentical
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Featuresidentical
MP3 playbackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB direct playbackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
FM antennaKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Microphone inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio inputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
AC input voltageDiffers	220 V	100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.5 V
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	310 mm	262 mm
Package depthDiffers	175 mm	159 mm
Package heightDiffers	272 mm	244 mm
Package weightDiffers	2.2 kg	1.9 kg
Storageidentical
Card reader integratedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible memory cardsKnown for one	SD, SDHC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	291 mm	240 mm
DepthDiffers	243 mm	212 mm
HeightDiffers	146 mm	131 mm
WeightDiffers	1.8 kg	1.4 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Warranty cardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable stereo system comparisons

All portable stereo system comparisons