Product comparison · 2 portable power stations

Acer APS322 portable power station 13 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) vs Ugreen 15053 portable power station 13 Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA)

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 6identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer APS322 portable power station 13 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) has 600 W more total output power than the Ugreen 15053 portable power station 13 Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA) (1800 W vs 1200 W). The Acer APS322 portable power station 13 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) has 2 more USB Type-A output ports than the Ugreen 15053 portable power station 13 Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA) (4 vs 2). The Acer APS322 portable power station 13 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) has 7.9 kg more weight than the Ugreen 15053 portable power station 13 Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA) (19.4 kg vs 11.5 kg). Charging source: AC on the Acer APS322 portable power station 13 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4), AC, USB on the Ugreen 15053 portable power station 13 Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA). AC outlets quantity: 3 AC outlet(s) on the Acer APS322 portable power station 13 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4), 6 AC outlet(s) on the Ugreen 15053 portable power station 13 Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA).

  • Charging source
    • APS322 portable power station 13 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4):AC
    • 15053 portable power station 13 Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA):AC, USB
  • Total output power
    • APS322 portable power station 13 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4):1800 W
    • 15053 portable power station 13 Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA):1200 W
  • AC outlets quantity
    • APS322 portable power station 13 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4):3 AC outlet(s)
    • 15053 portable power station 13 Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA):6 AC outlet(s)
  • USB Type-A output ports
    • APS322 portable power station 13 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4):4
    • 15053 portable power station 13 Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA):2
  • Weight
    • APS322 portable power station 13 Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4):19.4 kg
    • 15053 portable power station 13 Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA):11.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of APS322, 15053
30 specifications
Performance2 differ
Charging sourceDiffersACAC, USB
Number of charging cyclesKnown for one3000Unknown — not stated by the source
Total output powerDiffers1800 W1200 W
Battery charge time (AC)Known for one6 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1024 Wh
Designidentical
Housing materialKnown for oneAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)Unknown — not stated by the source
ShapeKnown for oneRectangleUnknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for oneButtonsUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-slip feetKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for outdoor useKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresKnown for oneOver current, Over total voltage, Over voltage, Short circuitUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Input interfaceKnown for oneAC + Solar + DCUnknown — not stated by the source
AC outlets quantityDiffers3 AC outlet(s)6 AC outlet(s)
USB connector typeKnown for oneUSB Type-A, USB Type-CUnknown — not stated by the source
USB portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-A output portsDiffers42
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers19.4 kg11.5 kg
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source340.6 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source221 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source269.2 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyDiffersLithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4)Sealed Lead Acid (VRLA)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable power station comparisons

All portable power station comparisons