Product comparison · 2 portable game consoles

ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA vs ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W

64specifications compared
10differ
54identical
9known for one product only

Key differences

The ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA has 1,300 MHz more processor frequency than the ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W (3300 MHz vs 2000 MHz). The ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W has 0.2 more Bluetooth version than the ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA (5.4 vs 5.2). The ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W has 35 W more USB Type-C required charging power (max) than the ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA (100 W vs 65 W). Display: LED on the ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA, IPS on the ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W.

Processor frequency
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA:3300 MHz
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W:2000 MHz
Display
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA:LED
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W:IPS
Bluetooth version
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA:5.2
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W:5.4
USB Type-C required charging power (max)
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA:65 W
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W:100 W
USB Type-C required charging power (min)
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA:45 W
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W:65 W
Width
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA:289 mm
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W:290 mm
Depth
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA:113 mm
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W:121 mm
Height
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA:50 mm
- ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W:50.9 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA, ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W
73 specifications	A ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA View product	B ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X RC73XA-NH018W View product
Performance1 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers	3300 MHz	2000 MHz
Display1 differ
DisplayDiffers	LED	IPS
Panel typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IPS-Level
Storage1 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffers	MicroSD (TransFlash)	MicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Network1 differ
Bluetooth versionDiffers	5.2	5.4
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2)
Power2 differ
USB Type-C required charging power (max)Differs	65 W	100 W
USB Type-C required charging power (min)Differs	45 W	65 W
Battery life (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	9.9 h
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	289 mm	290 mm
DepthDiffers	113 mm	121 mm
HeightDiffers	50 mm	50.9 mm
WeightDiffers	689 g	715 g
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one	319 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	152.8 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	1.67 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one	153 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Introduction yearKnown for one	2025	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable game console comparisons

All portable game console comparisons