Product comparison · 2 portable & party speakers

Mars Gaming MSBAXP, Bluetooth Speaker Compact Pink vs Mars Gaming MS-ECO Ecological Bluetooth 5.1 Speaker Organic Material Wheat Straw and Bamboo Compact Size

23specifications compared
17differ
6identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

Number of drivers
- MSBAXP, Bluetooth Speaker Compact Pink:3
- MS-ECO Ecological Bluetooth 5.1 Speaker Organic Material Wheat Straw and Bamboo Compact Size:1
RMS rated power
- MSBAXP, Bluetooth Speaker Compact Pink:10 W
- MS-ECO Ecological Bluetooth 5.1 Speaker Organic Material Wheat Straw and Bamboo Compact Size:8 W
Frequency range
- MSBAXP, Bluetooth Speaker Compact Pink:16 - 20000 Hz
- MS-ECO Ecological Bluetooth 5.1 Speaker Organic Material Wheat Straw and Bamboo Compact Size:20 - 20000 Hz
Connectivity technology
- MSBAXP, Bluetooth Speaker Compact Pink:Wired & Wireless
- MS-ECO Ecological Bluetooth 5.1 Speaker Organic Material Wheat Straw and Bamboo Compact Size:Wireless
Bluetooth version
- MSBAXP, Bluetooth Speaker Compact Pink:5.0
- MS-ECO Ecological Bluetooth 5.1 Speaker Organic Material Wheat Straw and Bamboo Compact Size:5.1
Product type
- MSBAXP, Bluetooth Speaker Compact Pink:Stereo portable speaker
- MS-ECO Ecological Bluetooth 5.1 Speaker Organic Material Wheat Straw and Bamboo Compact Size:Mono portable speaker
Product colour
- MSBAXP, Bluetooth Speaker Compact Pink:Pink
- MS-ECO Ecological Bluetooth 5.1 Speaker Organic Material Wheat Straw and Bamboo Compact Size:Grey
Card reader integrated
- MSBAXP, Bluetooth Speaker Compact Pink:Yes
- MS-ECO Ecological Bluetooth 5.1 Speaker Organic Material Wheat Straw and Bamboo Compact Size:No

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of MSBAXP, MSECO
35 specifications	A Mars Gaming MSBAXP, Bluetooth Speaker Compact Pink Model MSBAXP View product	B Mars Gaming MS-ECO Ecological Bluetooth 5.1 Speaker Organic Material Wheat Straw and Bamboo Compact Size Model MSECO View product
Loudspeakers1 differ
Number of driversDiffers	3	1
Audio2 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers	10 W	8 W
Frequency rangeDiffers	16 - 20000 Hz	20 - 20000 Hz
ImpedanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 Ω
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wired & Wireless	Wireless
Wi-Fi	No	No
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth versionDiffers	5.0	5.1
Bluetooth rangeKnown for one	10 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB connectivityKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB connector typeKnown for one	Micro-USB	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.3 m
Design2 differ
Product typeDiffers	Stereo portable speaker	Mono portable speaker
Product colourDiffers	Pink	Grey
Illumination LEDKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Illumination colourKnown for one	Blue, Green, Red	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Recommended usage	Universal	Universal
Card reader integratedDiffers	Yes	No
Compatible memory cardsKnown for one	MicroSD (TransFlash)	Unknown — not stated by the source
FM radioKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Battery type	Built-in battery	Built-in battery
Battery life (max)Differs	8 h	5 h
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	82 mm	91 mm
DepthDiffers	110 mm	43 mm
HeightDiffers	82 mm	91 mm
WeightDiffers	282 g	218 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	113 mm	44 mm
Package depthDiffers	88 mm	100 mm
Package heightDiffers	94 mm	110 mm
Package weightDiffers	326 g	258 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack	1 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Batteryidentical
Battery technology	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Battery capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	600 mAh

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable & party speakers comparisons

All portable & party speakers comparisons