Product comparison · 2 portable & party speakers

JBL GO 5 vs LG XBOOM XL5T

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 4identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The LG XBOOM XL5T has 195.2 W more RMS rated power than the JBL GO 5 (200 W vs 4.8 W). The LG XBOOM XL5T has 605 mm more package width than the JBL GO 5 (698 mm vs 93 mm). The LG XBOOM XL5T has 218 mm more package depth than the JBL GO 5 (354 mm vs 136 mm). Only the LG XBOOM XL5T has AC adapter included. Connectivity technology: Wireless on the JBL GO 5, Wired & Wireless on the LG XBOOM XL5T.

  • RMS rated power
    • GO 5:4.8 W
    • XBOOM XL5T:200 W
  • Connectivity technology
    • GO 5:Wireless
    • XBOOM XL5T:Wired & Wireless
  • Product type
    • GO 5:Mono portable speaker
    • XBOOM XL5T:Party speaker
  • Product colour
    • GO 5:White
    • XBOOM XL5T:Black
  • Recommended usage
    • GO 5:Tablet / Smartphone
    • XBOOM XL5T:Universal
  • Weight
    • GO 5:230 g
    • XBOOM XL5T:11.2 kg
  • Package width
    • GO 5:93 mm
    • XBOOM XL5T:698 mm
  • Package depth
    • GO 5:136 mm
    • XBOOM XL5T:354 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of GO 5, XBOOM XL5T
43 specifications
Loudspeakersidentical
Audio output channelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.1 channels
Speaker typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2-way
TweeterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of tweeter driversKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Tweeter diameter (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6.35 cm (2.5")
WooferKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of woofer driversKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Woofer diameter (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16.5 cm (6.5")
Audio1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers4.8 W200 W
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffersWirelessWired & Wireless
Bluetooth profilesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAAC, SBC
USB connectivityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
3.5 mm connectorKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
AUX inKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Product typeDiffersMono portable speakerParty speaker
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIPX4
Performance1 differ
Recommended usageDiffersTablet / SmartphoneUniversal
EqualizerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Card reader integratedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in microphoneKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
FM radioKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Battery life (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 h
Battery recharge timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.5 h
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source55 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 W
USB Type-C charging portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C required charging power (max)Known for one5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C required charging power (min)Known for one5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source289 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source280 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source570 mm
WeightDiffers230 g11.2 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers93 mm698 mm
Package depthDiffers136 mm354 mm
Package heightDiffers58 mm374 mm
Package weightDiffers320 g13.6 kg
Packaging content1 differ
AC adapter includedDiffersNoYes
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneLithium-Ion (Li-Ion)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable & party speakers comparisons

All portable & party speakers comparisons