Product comparison · 2 portable & party speakers

JBL Boombox Squad vs JBL Xtreme 5

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 8identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The JBL Xtreme 5 has 1.8 more Bluetooth version than the JBL Boombox Squad (6.0 vs 4.2). The JBL Boombox Squad has 6 Wh more battery capacity than the JBL Xtreme 5 (74 Wh vs 68 Wh). The JBL Boombox Squad has 3 h more battery recharge time than the JBL Xtreme 5 (6.5 h vs 3.5 h). Bluetooth profiles: A2DP, AVRCP, HFP on the JBL Boombox Squad, A2DP, AVRCP on the JBL Xtreme 5. Product colour: Camouflage on the JBL Boombox Squad, Black on the JBL Xtreme 5.

  • Bluetooth version
    • Boombox Squad:4.2
    • Xtreme 5:6.0
  • Bluetooth profiles
    • Boombox Squad:A2DP, AVRCP, HFP
    • Xtreme 5:A2DP, AVRCP
  • Product colour
    • Boombox Squad:Camouflage
    • Xtreme 5:Black
  • International Protection (IP) code
    • Boombox Squad:IPX7
    • Xtreme 5:IP68
  • Power source type
    • Boombox Squad:Battery
    • Xtreme 5:Battery, AC
  • Battery capacity
    • Boombox Squad:74 Wh
    • Xtreme 5:68 Wh
  • Battery recharge time
    • Boombox Squad:6.5 h
    • Xtreme 5:3.5 h
  • Width
    • Boombox Squad:495 mm
    • Xtreme 5:346 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Boombox Squad, Xtreme 5
46 specifications
Loudspeakersidentical
Number of tweeter driversKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Number of woofer driversKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Number of driversKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Tweeter diameterKnown for one2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Woofer diameterKnown for one10.2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Audioidentical
RMS rated powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source130 W
Frequency rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 - 20000 Hz
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Wi-FiKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Bluetooth versionDiffers4.26.0
Bluetooth profilesDiffersA2DP, AVRCP, HFPA2DP, AVRCP
3.5 mm connectorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
AUX inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Frequency rangeKnown for one2.402 - 2.48 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Design3 differ
Product typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStereo portable speaker
Product colourDiffersCamouflageBlack
Protection featuresDiffersWaterproofDustproof, Drop proof, Waterproof
International Protection (IP) codeDiffersIPX7IP68
Volume controlKnown for oneDigitalUnknown — not stated by the source
Carrying handle(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Power source typeDiffersBatteryBattery, AC
Battery capacityDiffers74 Wh68 Wh
Battery life (music)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source28 h
Battery recharge timeDiffers6.5 h3.5 h
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
USB Type-C charging portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
USB Type-C required charging power (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80 W
USB Type-C required charging power (min)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7.5 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers495 mm346 mm
DepthDiffers195.5 mm155 mm
HeightDiffers254.5 mm165 mm
WeightDiffers5.25 kg2.9 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source399 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source226 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source241 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.98 kg
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyDiffersLithium Polymer (LiPo)Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable & party speakers comparisons

All portable & party speakers comparisons