Product comparison · 2 portable & party speakers

Hama Pipe 2.0 vs Hama Twin 2.0

24specifications compared
7differ
17identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

RMS rated power
- Pipe 2.0:24 W
- Twin 2.0:20 W
International Protection (IP) code
- Pipe 2.0:IPX4
- Twin 2.0:IPX7
Battery voltage
- Pipe 2.0:7.4 V
- Twin 2.0:3.7 V
Battery life (max)
- Pipe 2.0:12 h
- Twin 2.0:6 h
Battery recharge time
- Pipe 2.0:4 h
- Twin 2.0:2.5 h
Weight
- Pipe 2.0:580 g
- Twin 2.0:745 g
Battery capacity
- Pipe 2.0:2000 mAh
- Twin 2.0:3000 mAh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Pipe 2.0, Twin 2.0
28 specifications	A Hama Pipe 2.0 View product	B Hama Twin 2.0 View product
Audio1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers	24 W	20 W
Ports & interfacesidentical
3.5 mm connectorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
AUX inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
International Protection (IP) codeDiffers	IPX4	IPX7
Performanceidentical
Card reader integratedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Battery capacityKnown for one	14.8 Wh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery voltageDiffers	7.4 V	3.7 V
Battery life (max)Differs	12 h	6 h
Battery recharge timeDiffers	4 h	2.5 h
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	580 g	745 g
Battery1 differ
Battery capacityDiffers	2000 mAh	3000 mAh

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable & party speakers comparisons

All portable & party speakers comparisons