Product comparison · 2 portable & party speakers

Hama Cube 2.0 vs Hama Tube 2.0

29specifications compared
7differ
22identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

RMS rated power
- Cube 2.0:4 W
- Tube 2.0:3 W
USB connector type
- Cube 2.0:USB Type-C
- Tube 2.0:Micro-USB
Product design
- Cube 2.0:Cube
- Tube 2.0:Tube
Battery life (max)
- Cube 2.0:10 h
- Tube 2.0:8 h
Cables included
- Cube 2.0:USB Type-C
- Tube 2.0:USB
Battery technology
- Cube 2.0:Lithium Polymer (LiPo)
- Tube 2.0:Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Battery capacity
- Cube 2.0:1050 mAh
- Tube 2.0:600 mAh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Cube 2.0, Tube 2.0
30 specifications	A Hama Cube 2.0 View product	B Hama Tube 2.0 View product
Audio1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers	4 W	3 W
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB connector typeDiffers	USB Type-C	Micro-USB
Design1 differ
Product designDiffers	Cube	Tube
Power1 differ
Battery life (max)Differs	10 h	8 h
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	200 g
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	USB Type-C	USB
Battery2 differ
Battery technologyDiffers	Lithium Polymer (LiPo)	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Battery capacityDiffers	1050 mAh	600 mAh

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable & party speakers comparisons

All portable & party speakers comparisons