Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Electrolux EXP26U758CW portable air conditioner vs Whirlpool AMD 091/1

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 5identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

  • Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
    • EXP26U758CW portable air conditioner:3.6
    • AMD 091/1:2.6
  • Noise level
    • EXP26U758CW portable air conditioner:60.4 dB
    • AMD 091/1:65 dB
  • Refrigerating medium
    • EXP26U758CW portable air conditioner:R290
    • AMD 091/1:R410A
  • Energy efficiency class (cooling)
    • EXP26U758CW portable air conditioner:A++
    • AMD 091/1:A
  • AC input voltage
    • EXP26U758CW portable air conditioner:220 - 240 V
    • AMD 091/1:220-240 V
  • Product colour
    • EXP26U758CW portable air conditioner:Black, White
    • AMD 091/1:White
  • Width
    • EXP26U758CW portable air conditioner:493 mm
    • AMD 091/1:460 mm
  • Depth
    • EXP26U758CW portable air conditioner:420 mm
    • AMD 091/1:360 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of EXP26U758CW, AMD 091/1
44 specifications
Features4 differ
TypeMonobloc mobile air conditionerMonobloc mobile air conditioner
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Dehumidifying, VentilatingCooling, Dehumidifying, Fan, Heating
Comfort sleeping modeYesYes
Variable powerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity (nominal)Known for one9895 BTU/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one2600 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs3.62.6
Wi-FiKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi readyKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityKnown for one1.2 l/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelDiffers60.4 dB65 dB
Airflow (low speed)Known for one340 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (medium speed)Known for one380 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (high speed)Known for one420 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for room area up toKnown for one30 m²Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filterYesYes
Refrigerating mediumDiffersR290R410A
Refrigerating medium weightKnown for one0.235 gUnknown — not stated by the source
TimerYesYes
Timer typeKnown for oneDigitalUnknown — not stated by the source
Timer duration (maximum)Known for one24 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Remotely operatedYesYes
Global warming potentialKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Compressor typeKnown for oneRotaryUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2840 W
Filter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePolyethylene terephthalate (PET)
Castor wheelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)DiffersA++A
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA+++ to DUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageDiffers220 - 240 V220-240 V
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.1 kWh
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 Hz
Design1 differ
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersBlack, WhiteWhite
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers493 mm460 mm
DepthDiffers420 mm360 mm
HeightDiffers796 mm840 mm
WeightDiffers34.5 kg36 kg
Technical detailsidentical
CertificationKnown for oneCEUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Remote control includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Warranty cardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons