Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

De’Longhi PAC EL98 vs De’Longhi Pac EX130 Eco Real Feel

22specifications compared
12differ
10identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

Air conditioner functions
- PAC EL98:Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan
- Pac EX130 Eco Real Feel:Cooling, Dehumidifying
Cooling capacity (max)
- PAC EL98:10700 BTU/h
- Pac EX130 Eco Real Feel:13000 BTU/h
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)
- PAC EL98:930 W
- Pac EX130 Eco Real Feel:3300 W
Noise level
- PAC EL98:64 dB
- Pac EX130 Eco Real Feel:65 dB
Suitable for room volume up to
- PAC EL98:100 m³
- Pac EX130 Eco Real Feel:120 m³
Timer duration (maximum)
- PAC EL98:24 h
- Pac EX130 Eco Real Feel:12 h
Real Feel technology
- PAC EL98:No
- Pac EX130 Eco Real Feel:Yes
Product colour
- PAC EL98:White
- Pac EX130 Eco Real Feel:Black

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PAC EL98, Pac EX130 Eco Real Feel
49 specifications	A De’Longhi PAC EL98 View product	B De’Longhi Pac EX130 Eco Real Feel View product
Features7 differ
TypeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Monobloc mobile air conditioner
Air conditioner functionsDiffers	Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan	Cooling, Dehumidifying
Cooling capacity (max)Differs	10700 BTU/h	13000 BTU/h
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Differs	930 W	3300 W
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)	2.6	2.6
Dehumidifier function	Yes	Yes
Wi-FiKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Wi-Fi readyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Built-in fan	Yes	Yes
Number of speeds	3	3
Dehumidifying capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.25 l/h
Noise levelDiffers	64 dB	65 dB
Airflow (low speed)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	235 m³/h
Airflow (medium speed)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	270 m³/h
Airflow (high speed)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	310 m³/h
Suitable for room volume up toDiffers	100 m³	120 m³
Air filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Refrigerating mediumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	R290
Timer	Yes	Yes
Timer type	Digital	Digital
Timer duration (maximum)Differs	24 h	12 h
Handle(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Real Feel technologyDiffers	No	Yes
Adjustable thermostatKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for one	930 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Hose lengthKnown for one	1.2 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Remotely operatedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Castor wheelsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
TechnologyKnown for one	Air - air	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Energy efficiency class (cooling)	A	A
Energy efficiency class (heating)	No	No
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A+++ to D
Connected loadKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1050 W
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.3 kWh
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
Design1 differ
Built-in display	Yes	Yes
Display type	LED	LED
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	510 mm	445 mm
DepthDiffers	465 mm	390 mm
HeightDiffers	870 mm	805 mm
WeightDiffers	33 kg	35.4 kg
Package widthKnown for one	450 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	410 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	750 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	36 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Remote control includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons