Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Beko BPN109C portable air conditioner vs Beko BPN112H portable air conditioner

33specifications compared
8differ
25identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Cooling capacity (max)
- BPN109C portable air conditioner:9000 BTU/h
- BPN112H portable air conditioner:12000 BTU/h
Dehumidifying capacity
- BPN109C portable air conditioner:1 l/h
- BPN112H portable air conditioner:1.2 l/h
Cooling temperature range
- BPN109C portable air conditioner:16 - 35 °C
- BPN112H portable air conditioner:18 - 35 °C
Energy efficiency class (heating)
- BPN109C portable air conditioner:No
- BPN112H portable air conditioner:A
Display type
- BPN109C portable air conditioner:LCD
- BPN112H portable air conditioner:LED
Control type
- BPN109C portable air conditioner:Touch
- BPN112H portable air conditioner:Touch, Wireless
Weight
- BPN109C portable air conditioner:28.5 kg
- BPN112H portable air conditioner:30.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of BPN109C, BPN112H
52 specifications	A Beko BPN109C portable air conditioner Model BPN109C View product	B Beko BPN112H portable air conditioner Model BPN112H View product
Features4 differ
Type	Monobloc mobile air conditioner	Monobloc mobile air conditioner
Air conditioner functionsDiffers	Cooling, Dehumidifying	Cooling, Dehumidifying, Heating, Ventilating
Comfort sleeping mode	Yes	Yes
Cooling capacity (max)Differs	9000 BTU/h	12000 BTU/h
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)	2.6	2.6
Dehumidifier function	Yes	Yes
Automatic temperature control	Yes	Yes
Number of speeds	3	3
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers	1 l/h	1.2 l/h
Sound power levelKnown for one	65 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sound pressure level (min)	48 dB	48 dB
Noise level	65 dB	65 dB
Airflow (low speed)Known for one	380 m³/h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (high speed)	380 m³/h	380 m³/h
On/off switch	Yes	Yes
Air filter	Yes	Yes
Washable filter	Yes	Yes
Timer	Yes	Yes
Timer type	Digital	Digital
Timer duration (maximum)	24 h	24 h
OscillationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling temperature rangeDiffers	16 - 35 °C	18 - 35 °C
Auto-restartKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Variable powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Heating energy efficiency (COP, W/W)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.3
Built-in fanKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Refrigerating mediumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	R290
Remotely operatedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Climate classKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	T
Global warming potentialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Heating temperature rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7 - 27 °C
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)	A	A
Energy efficiency class (heating)Differs	No	A
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Known for one	2.6 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltage	220 - 240 V	220 - 240 V
AC input frequency	50 Hz	50 Hz
Design2 differ
Built-in display	Yes	Yes
Display typeDiffers	LCD	LED
Product colour	White	White
Control typeDiffers	Touch	Touch, Wireless
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width	440 mm	440 mm
Depth	335 mm	335 mm
Height	715 mm	715 mm
WeightDiffers	28.5 kg	30.5 kg
Package widthKnown for one	474 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	376 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	885 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	32 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	16 - 35 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control batteries includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Manual	Yes	Yes
Remote control included	Yes	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons