Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

AEG AXP26U558HW portable air conditioner vs AEG AXP35U538CW portable air conditioner

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 10identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

  • Dehumidifying capacity
    • AXP26U558HW portable air conditioner:1.2 l/h
    • AXP35U538CW portable air conditioner:1.6 l/h
  • Noise level
    • AXP26U558HW portable air conditioner:61 dB
    • AXP35U538CW portable air conditioner:64 dB
  • Hourly energy consumption (cooling)
    • AXP26U558HW portable air conditioner:0.9 kWh
    • AXP35U538CW portable air conditioner:1.2 kWh
  • Weight
    • AXP26U558HW portable air conditioner:34.5 kg
    • AXP35U538CW portable air conditioner:34 kg
  • Package width
    • AXP26U558HW portable air conditioner:570 mm
    • AXP35U538CW portable air conditioner:515 mm
  • Package depth
    • AXP26U558HW portable air conditioner:515 mm
    • AXP35U538CW portable air conditioner:570 mm
  • Package weight
    • AXP26U558HW portable air conditioner:41 kg
    • AXP35U538CW portable air conditioner:39 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of AXP26U558HW, AXP35U538CW
43 specifications
Features3 differ
TypeMonobloc mobile air conditionerMonobloc mobile air conditioner
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Dehumidifying, Fan, Heating, VentilatingCooling, Dehumidifying
Cooling capacity (max)Known for one9000 BTU/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating capacity (max)Known for one8000 BTU/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for one2600 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating capacity in watts (max)Known for one2300 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)3.13.1
Heating energy efficiency (COP, W/W)Known for one3.6Unknown — not stated by the source
Automatic temperature controlKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Wi-FiKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers1.2 l/h1.6 l/h
Noise levelDiffers61 dB64 dB
Airflow (high speed)Known for one420 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for room area up toKnown for one40 m²Unknown — not stated by the source
Anti-bacterial filterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Refrigerating mediumR290R290
TimerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Timer typeKnown for oneDigitalUnknown — not stated by the source
Remotely operatedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Castor wheelsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Global warming potential33
Cord lengthKnown for one1.8 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3500 W
Air filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Refrigerating medium weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.23 g
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)A+A+
Energy efficiency class (heating)Known for oneA+++Unknown — not stated by the source
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Differs0.9 kWh1.2 kWh
Hourly energy consumption (heating)Known for one0.7 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Housing materialKnown for oneStainless steelUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourBlack, Silver, WhiteBlack, Silver, White
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width493 mm493 mm
Depth420 mm420 mm
Height796 mm796 mm
WeightDiffers34.5 kg34 kg
Package widthDiffers570 mm515 mm
Package depthDiffers515 mm570 mm
Package height885 mm885 mm
Package weightDiffers41 kg39 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons