Product comparison · 2 pond & pool vacuums

Bestway Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum vs Kokido KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 5identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

The Kokido KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner has 59 mm more width than the Bestway Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum (425 mm vs 366 mm). The Kokido KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner has 55 mm more height than the Bestway Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum (200 mm vs 145 mm). The Bestway Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum has 50 mm more master (outer) case height than the Kokido KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner (530 mm vs 480 mm). Product type: Manual vacuum on the Bestway Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum, Suction-side cleaner on the Kokido KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner. Product colour: Blue, White on the Bestway Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum, Blue, Grey on the Kokido KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner.

  • Product type
    • Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum:Manual vacuum
    • KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner:Suction-side cleaner
  • Product colour
    • Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum:Blue, White
    • KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner:Blue, Grey
  • Width
    • Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum:366 mm
    • KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner:425 mm
  • Height
    • Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum:145 mm
    • KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner:200 mm
  • Weight
    • Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum:750 g
    • KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner:3.54 kg
  • Master (outer) case height
    • Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum:530 mm
    • KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner:480 mm
  • Master (outer) case length
    • Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum:400 mm
    • KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner:780 mm
  • Master (outer) case width
    • Flowclear AquaSuction Pool and Leaf Vacuum:400 mm
    • KRILL Automatic Pool Cleaner:220 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 58657, AC11CBX
32 specifications
Features2 differ
Product typeDiffersManual vacuumSuction-side cleaner
Suitable forPool & SpaPool & Spa
Suitable for cleaningBottomBottom
PurposeAbove ground poolAbove ground pool
Minimum pumping capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.8 m³/h
Filter bagYesYes
Product colourDiffersBlue, WhiteBlue, Grey
Suction hose lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 m
Debris bag capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.75 L
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Filter typeKnown for oneFilter bagUnknown — not stated by the source
QuantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Pump powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source99 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers366 mm425 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source430 mm
HeightDiffers145 mm200 mm
WeightDiffers750 g3.54 kg
Logistics data4 differ
Master (outer) case heightDiffers530 mm480 mm
Master (outer) case lengthDiffers400 mm780 mm
Master (outer) case widthDiffers400 mm220 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 pc(s)
Products per shipping (inner) caseDiffers6 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Packaging contentidentical
Hose includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Batteries includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers380 mm765 mm
Package depthDiffers380 mm205 mm
Package heightDiffers150 mm225 mm
Package weightDiffers1 kg4.35 kg
Package typeFull color boxFull color box
Package volumeKnown for one85000 cm³Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Master (outer) case GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for one46941607305155Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pond & pool vacuums comparisons

All pond & pool vacuums comparisons