Product comparison · 2 poe adapters

LevelOne 2.5 Gigabit PoE Injector vs StarTech.com 1-Port 2.5GbE PoE+ Injector, 10M/100M/1G/2.5G Ethernet, PoE/PoE+ 802.3af/802.3at

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 6identical
  • 39known for one product only

Key differences

The StarTech.com 1-Port 2.5GbE PoE+ Injector, 10M/100M/1G/2.5G Ethernet, PoE/PoE+ 802.3af/802.3at has 30.4 W more power consumption (typical) than the LevelOne 2.5 Gigabit PoE Injector (32.4 W vs 2 W). The LevelOne 2.5 Gigabit PoE Injector has 100 g more weight than the StarTech.com 1-Port 2.5GbE PoE+ Injector, 10M/100M/1G/2.5G Ethernet, PoE/PoE+ 802.3af/802.3at (200 g vs 100 g). Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 40 °C on the LevelOne 2.5 Gigabit PoE Injector, 0 - 50 °C on the StarTech.com 1-Port 2.5GbE PoE+ Injector, 10M/100M/1G/2.5G Ethernet, PoE/PoE+ 802.3af/802.3at. Operating relative humidity (H-H): 0 - 90% on the LevelOne 2.5 Gigabit PoE Injector, 5 - 95% on the StarTech.com 1-Port 2.5GbE PoE+ Injector, 10M/100M/1G/2.5G Ethernet, PoE/PoE+ 802.3af/802.3at. Storage temperature (T-T): 10 - 85 °C on the LevelOne 2.5 Gigabit PoE Injector, -10 - 70 °C on the StarTech.com 1-Port 2.5GbE PoE+ Injector, 10M/100M/1G/2.5G Ethernet, PoE/PoE+ 802.3af/802.3at.

  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 2.5 Gigabit PoE Injector:2 W
    • 1-Port 2.5GbE PoE+ Injector, 10M/100M/1G/2.5G Ethernet, PoE/PoE+ 802.3af/802.3at:32.4 W
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • 2.5 Gigabit PoE Injector:0 - 40 °C
    • 1-Port 2.5GbE PoE+ Injector, 10M/100M/1G/2.5G Ethernet, PoE/PoE+ 802.3af/802.3at:0 - 50 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • 2.5 Gigabit PoE Injector:0 - 90%
    • 1-Port 2.5GbE PoE+ Injector, 10M/100M/1G/2.5G Ethernet, PoE/PoE+ 802.3af/802.3at:5 - 95%
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • 2.5 Gigabit PoE Injector:10 - 85 °C
    • 1-Port 2.5GbE PoE+ Injector, 10M/100M/1G/2.5G Ethernet, PoE/PoE+ 802.3af/802.3at:-10 - 70 °C
  • Weight
    • 2.5 Gigabit PoE Injector:200 g
    • 1-Port 2.5GbE PoE+ Injector, 10M/100M/1G/2.5G Ethernet, PoE/PoE+ 802.3af/802.3at:100 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of POI-3015, AF212C-POE-INJECTOR
53 specifications
Network2 differ
Ethernet interface typeDiffersFast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet, 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet1.25 Gigabit Ethernet, 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet
Auto MDI/MDI-XKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cable types supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCat5, Cat5e, Cat6, Cat6a
ChipsetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMonolithic Power Systems - MP3924
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at, IEEE 802.3bzIEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at, IEEE 802.3bz, IEEE 802.3i, IEEE 802.3u
Power over Ethernet (PoE) type supportedKnown for onePoE+Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Surge protectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Maximum operating distanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 m
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePower
Jumbo framesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9000
Jumbo frames supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Auto-negotiationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wall mountableKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to installKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
RJ-45 input portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
RJ-45 output portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DC-in jackKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
AC adapter output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source54 V
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.8 A
Output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.6 A
Power consumption (typical)Differs2 W32.4 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE) power per portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Surge protection voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 kV
Total Power over Ethernet (PoE) budgetKnown for one30 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificates1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffersCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)RoHS
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C0 - 50 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs0 - 90%5 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs10 - 85 °C-10 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers200 g100 g
WidthKnown for one64.4 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one145.7 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one41.8 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentKnown for oneDeclaration of ConformityUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source124 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source210 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source51 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source364 g
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source520 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source285 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source455 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 pc(s)
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for one851762Unknown — not stated by the source
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one851762Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Power source typeKnown for oneACUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More poe adapter comparisons

All poe adapter comparisons