Product comparison · 2 poe adapters

InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps vs Linksys LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet

13specifications compared
8differ
5identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Linksys LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet has 0.2 A more input current than the InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps (0.8 A vs 0.6 A). The InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps has 5 - 90% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the Linksys LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet (10 - 90% vs 5 - 90%). The InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps has 73.5 mm more width than the Linksys LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet (142 mm vs 68.5 mm). LED indicators: Link, Power on the InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps, Yes on the Linksys LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet. Storage temperature (T-T): -40 - 70 °C on the InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps, -30 - 80 °C on the Linksys LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet.

LED indicators
- PoE+ injector 1Gbps:Link, Power
- LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:Yes
Input current
- PoE+ injector 1Gbps:0.6 A
- LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:0.8 A
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- PoE+ injector 1Gbps:10 - 90%
- LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:5 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)
- PoE+ injector 1Gbps:-40 - 70 °C
- LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:-30 - 80 °C
Width
- PoE+ injector 1Gbps:142 mm
- LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:68.5 mm
Depth
- PoE+ injector 1Gbps:60 mm
- LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:99 mm
Height
- PoE+ injector 1Gbps:32 mm
- LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:33 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 44432I, LAPPI30W
33 specifications	A InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps Model 44432I View product	B Linksys LAPPI30W PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet Model LAPPI30W View product
Network1 differ
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at, IEEE 802.3u
Ethernet interface typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gigabit Ethernet
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cable types supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Cat5e
Features1 differ
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	100 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsDiffers	Link, Power	Yes
Power protection featuresKnown for one	Short circuit	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
RJ-45 input portsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
RJ-45 output portsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power over Ethernet (PoE) voltageKnown for one	230 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input voltageKnown for one	100 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input frequencyKnown for one	50/60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input currentDiffers	0.6 A	0.8 A
Output currentKnown for one	0.58 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total Power over Ethernet (PoE) budgetKnown for one	32 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 W
AC adapter input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
AC adapter frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	47 - 63 Hz
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	10 - 90%	5 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-40 - 70 °C	-30 - 80 °C
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	142 mm	68.5 mm
DepthDiffers	60 mm	99 mm
HeightDiffers	32 mm	33 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	149.6 g
Packaging contentidentical
Power cord includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for one	Box	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC, ISED Canada, UL, CE, RCM

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More poe adapter comparisons

All poe adapter comparisons