Product comparison · 2 poe adapters

EnGenius EPA5006HAT PoE adapter 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet vs InLine 44432D PoE adapter 10 Gigabit Ethernet

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 1identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine 44432D PoE adapter 10 Gigabit Ethernet has 7.5 Gigabit Ethernet more Ethernet interface type than the EnGenius EPA5006HAT PoE adapter 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet (10 Gigabit Ethernet vs 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet). The InLine 44432D PoE adapter 10 Gigabit Ethernet has 7,500 Mbit/s more Ethernet LAN data rates than the EnGenius EPA5006HAT PoE adapter 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet (10000 Mbit/s vs 2500 Mbit/s). The InLine 44432D PoE adapter 10 Gigabit Ethernet has 90 W more output power than the EnGenius EPA5006HAT PoE adapter 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet (120 W vs 30 W). Networking standards: IEEE 802.3at on the EnGenius EPA5006HAT PoE adapter 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet, IEEE 802.3bt on the InLine 44432D PoE adapter 10 Gigabit Ethernet. Product colour: Black on the EnGenius EPA5006HAT PoE adapter 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet, Grey, Black on the InLine 44432D PoE adapter 10 Gigabit Ethernet.

  • Ethernet interface type
    • EPA5006HAT PoE adapter 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet:2.5 Gigabit Ethernet
    • 44432D PoE adapter 10 Gigabit Ethernet:10 Gigabit Ethernet
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • EPA5006HAT PoE adapter 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet:2500 Mbit/s
    • 44432D PoE adapter 10 Gigabit Ethernet:10000 Mbit/s
  • Networking standards
    • EPA5006HAT PoE adapter 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet:IEEE 802.3at
    • 44432D PoE adapter 10 Gigabit Ethernet:IEEE 802.3bt
  • Product colour
    • EPA5006HAT PoE adapter 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet:Black
    • 44432D PoE adapter 10 Gigabit Ethernet:Grey, Black
  • Output power
    • EPA5006HAT PoE adapter 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet:30 W
    • 44432D PoE adapter 10 Gigabit Ethernet:120 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of EPA5006HAT, 44432D
27 specifications
Network3 differ
Ethernet interface typeDiffers2.5 Gigabit Ethernet10 Gigabit Ethernet
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers2500 Mbit/s10000 Mbit/s
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.3atIEEE 802.3bt
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackGrey, Black
Wall mountableKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Surge protectionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one100 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresKnown for oneShort circuit, Surge protectionUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
RJ-45 input portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
RJ-45 output portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Power1 differ
Power over Ethernet (PoE) voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source57 V
Output powerDiffers30 W120 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 90 °C
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source77 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source164 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source43 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source270 g
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source77 x 164 x 43 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Number of products includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source105 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source210 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source55 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source384 g
Package volumeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1200 cm³

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More poe adapter comparisons

All poe adapter comparisons