Product comparison · 2 poe adapters

Cudy POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet vs InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 11identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps has 176 V more power over Ethernet (PoE) voltage than the Cudy POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet (230 V vs 54 V). The InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps has 0.1 A more input current than the Cudy POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet (0.6 A vs 0.5 A). The InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps has 21 mm more width than the Cudy POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet (142 mm vs 121 mm). LED indicators: PoE, Power on the Cudy POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet, Link, Power on the InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps. Power protection features: Over current, Over voltage, Overload on the Cudy POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet, Short circuit on the InLine PoE+ injector 1Gbps.

  • LED indicators
    • POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:PoE, Power
    • PoE+ injector 1Gbps:Link, Power
  • Power over Ethernet (PoE) voltage
    • POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:54 V
    • PoE+ injector 1Gbps:230 V
  • Input current
    • POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:0.5 A
    • PoE+ injector 1Gbps:0.6 A
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:14 - 113 °F
    • PoE+ injector 1Gbps:0 - 40 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:10 - 95%
    • PoE+ injector 1Gbps:10 - 90%
  • Storage relative humidity (H-H)
    • POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:5 - 95%
    • PoE+ injector 1Gbps:5 - 90%
  • Width
    • POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:121 mm
    • PoE+ injector 1Gbps:142 mm
  • Depth
    • POE200 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:50 mm
    • PoE+ injector 1Gbps:60 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of POE200, 44432I
40 specifications
Networkidentical
Ethernet interface typeKnown for oneGigabit EthernetUnknown — not stated by the source
Cabling technologyKnown for one10/100/1000Unknown — not stated by the source
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable types supportedKnown for oneCat5eUnknown — not stated by the source
Features2 differ
Wall mountableKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to installKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Surge protectionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsDiffersPoE, PowerLink, Power
Pin assignment & polarityKnown for one1/2 (-), 3/6 (+)Unknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresDiffersOver current, Over voltage, OverloadShort circuit
Power2 differ
Power over Ethernet (PoE) voltageDiffers54 V230 V
Output powerKnown for one30 WUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Input currentDiffers0.5 A0.6 A
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 - 240 V
Input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50/60 Hz
Output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.58 A
Total Power over Ethernet (PoE) budgetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32 W
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs14 - 113 °F0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 95%10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 95%5 - 90%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers121 mm142 mm
DepthDiffers50 mm60 mm
HeightDiffers36 mm32 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Number of products includedKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one171 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one72 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one72 mmUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More poe adapter comparisons

All poe adapter comparisons