Product comparison · 2 photo printers

Epson PictureMate 500 vs Epson Stylus Photo R800

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 9identical
  • 34known for one product only

Key differences

The Epson Stylus Photo R800 has 5.2 kg more weight than the Epson PictureMate 500 (8 kg vs 2.8 kg). Minimum processor: Pentium II 500MHz (PC) PowerPC G4 (Mac) on the Epson PictureMate 500, Pentium III 500 Mhz on the Epson Stylus Photo R800. Dimensions (WxDxH): 256 x 154 x 167 mm on the Epson PictureMate 500, 495 x 307 x 198 mm on the Epson Stylus Photo R800.

  • Weight
    • PictureMate 500:2.8 kg
    • Stylus Photo R800:8 kg
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • PictureMate 500:256 x 154 x 167 mm
    • Stylus Photo R800:495 x 307 x 198 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of PictureMate 500, Stylus Photo R800
46 specifications
Printingidentical
Print technologyKnown for oneInkjetUnknown — not stated by the source
Print head nozzlesKnown for one6 x 90Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
DisplayKnown for oneLCDUnknown — not stated by the source
Display diagonalKnown for one6.1 cm (2.4")Unknown — not stated by the source
Display resolutionKnown for one320 x 240 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for oneJapanUnknown — not stated by the source
Input & output capacityidentical
Total input capacityKnown for one20 sheetsUnknown — not stated by the source
Paper handlingidentical
Paper tray media typesKnown for oneGlossy paper, Photo paperUnknown — not stated by the source
Printing sizesKnown for one10 x 15 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Standard media sizesKnown for one10 x 15cm / 4"x6"Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Direct printingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
PictBridgeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
FireWire 400Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Performanceidentical
Sound pressure level (printing)Known for one45 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (printing)Known for one13 WUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Minimum processorDiffersPentium II 500MHz (PC) PowerPC G4 (Mac)Pentium III 500 Mhz
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers2.8 kg8 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one325 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one430 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one280 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one4.85 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Pallet gross widthKnown for one80 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Pallet gross lengthKnown for one120 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Pallet gross heightKnown for one2.11 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Products per pallet layerKnown for one7 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per palletKnown for one84 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet width (UK)Known for one100 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Pallet length (UK)Known for one120 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Pallet height (UK)Known for one2.11 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Products per pallet layer (UK)Known for one7 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per pallet (UK)Known for one112 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs256 x 154 x 167 mm495 x 307 x 198 mm
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneMicrosoft Windows98 / 2000 / XP / Me Mac OS 9.1, Mac OS X 10.2Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for oneAC 220 ~ 240vUnknown — not stated by the source
Print speed (black, normal quality, A4/US Letter)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source17 ppm
Print speed (colour, normal quality, A4/US Letter)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 ppm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More photo printer comparisons

All photo printer comparisons