Product comparison · 2 photo printers

Canon SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation vs HP Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink)

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 2identical
  • 35known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation has 28 W more power consumption (printing) than the HP Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink) (60 W vs 32 W). The Canon SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation has 100.6 mm more width than the HP Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink) (180.6 mm vs 80 mm). The Canon SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation has 18.4 mm more depth than the HP Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink) (135.9 mm vs 117.5 mm). Only the Canon SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation has card reader integrated. Print technology: Dye-sublimation on the Canon SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation, ZINK (Zero ink) on the HP Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink).

  • Print technology
    • SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation:Dye-sublimation
    • Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink):ZINK (Zero ink)
  • Maximum resolution
    • SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation:300 x 300 DPI
    • Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink):313 x 400 DPI
  • Product colour
    • SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation:Black
    • Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink):Pearl
  • Card reader integrated
    • SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation:Yes
    • Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink):No
  • Power consumption (printing)
    • SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation:60 W
    • Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink):32 W
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation:20 - 80%
    • Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink):5 - 70%
  • Width
    • SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation:180.6 mm
    • Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink):80 mm
  • Depth
    • SELPHY CP1200 photo printer Dye-sublimation:135.9 mm
    • Sprocket 200 photo printer ZINK (Zero ink):117.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CP1200, 200
47 specifications
Printing2 differ
Print technologyDiffersDye-sublimationZINK (Zero ink)
Maximum resolutionDiffers300 x 300 DPI313 x 400 DPI
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackPearl
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEN 301 489-1 V2.1.1:2017, EN 301 489-17 V3.1.1:2017, EN 55032:2015/+AC:2016 Class B, EN 55024:2010+A1:2015, EN 61000-3-2:2014, EN 61000-3-3:2013, CISPR 32:2015+COR1:2016 Class B, EN 50581:2012, ICES-003, Issue 6
HP segmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHome, Home office
Market positioningKnown for oneHome & officeUnknown — not stated by the source
Colour depthKnown for one24 bitUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display diagonalKnown for one6.86 cm (2.7")Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of printing coloursKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Input & output capacityidentical
Total input capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 sheets
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum print sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2" x 3" (5x7.6 cm)
Networkidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
BluetoothKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wi-FiKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source64 MB
Card reader integratedDiffersYesNo
Compatible memory cardsKnown for oneSD, SDHC, SDXCUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLithium Polymer (LiPo)
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source550 mAh
Power1 differ
Power sourceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBattery
Power consumption (printing)Differs60 W32 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one4 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Brand-specific featuresidentical
HP Auto-On/Auto-OffKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
System requirementsidentical
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAndroid, iOS
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Professional x64, Windows 7 Starter, Windows 7 Starter x64, Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Windows 8, WinUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-30 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs20 - 80%5 - 70%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 90%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers180.6 mm80 mm
DepthDiffers135.9 mm117.5 mm
HeightDiffers63.3 mm25 mm
WeightDiffers860 g172 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source165 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source270 g
AC adapter includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Quick start guideKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Direct printingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
PictBridgeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
USB connectorKnown for oneUSB Type-A / Mini-USB Type-BUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More photo printer comparisons

All photo printer comparisons