Product comparison · 2 phones

LG KG800, Chocolate White vs Samsung U600 Copper Gold

25specifications compared
14differ
11identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Product colour
- KG800, Chocolate White:White
- U600 Copper Gold:Gold
Display resolution
- KG800, Chocolate White:176 x 220 pixels
- U600 Copper Gold:240 x 320 pixels
Flash card support
- KG800, Chocolate White:No
- U600 Copper Gold:Yes
Rear camera resolution (numeric)
- KG800, Chocolate White:1.3 MP
- U600 Copper Gold:3 MP
Data network
- KG800, Chocolate White:GPRS
- U600 Copper Gold:Edge
FM radio
- KG800, Chocolate White:No
- U600 Copper Gold:Yes
Talk time (2G) (max)
- KG800, Chocolate White:3.3 h
- U600 Copper Gold:3.5 h
Standby time (2G) (max)
- KG800, Chocolate White:200 h
- U600 Copper Gold:250 h

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of KG800, Chocolate White, U600 Copper Gold
43 specifications	A LG KG800, Chocolate White View product	B Samsung U600 Copper Gold View product
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Gold
Display1 differ
Display resolutionDiffers	176 x 220 pixels	240 x 320 pixels
Display diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.9 cm (1.93")
Memory1 differ
Flash card supportDiffers	No	Yes
Internal memoryKnown for one	128 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Camera1 differ
Rear camera resolution (numeric)Differs	1.3 MP	3 MP
Digital zoomKnown for one	4x	Unknown — not stated by the source
Rear camera resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2048 x 1536 pixels
Image formats supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	GIF, PNG, WBMP
Network1 differ
Data networkDiffers	GPRS	Edge
Audio1 differ
FM radioDiffers	No	Yes
Power2 differ
Talk time (2G) (max)Differs	3.3 h	3.5 h
Standby time (2G) (max)Differs	200 h	250 h
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WeightDiffers	83 g	81 g
DepthDiffers	48 mm	49.3 mm
HeightDiffers	15.2 mm	10.9 mm
WidthDiffers	95 mm	103.2 mm
Phone featuresidentical
Form factorKnown for one	Slider	Unknown — not stated by the source
Personal info management (PIM)Known for one	Alarm clock, Calendar	Unknown — not stated by the source
Text prediction systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Text prediction system typeKnown for one	T9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vibrating alertKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery2 differ
Battery technologyDiffers	Lithium Polymer (LiPo)	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Battery capacityDiffers	800 mAh	690 mAh
Other featuresidentical
InterfaceKnown for one	Bluetooth, USB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking typeKnown for one	GSM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating frequencyKnown for one	900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Playback formatsKnown for one	WMA, AAC,AAC+, MP3	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Video capabilityKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Videoidentical
Video capture resolution (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	176 x 144 pixels
Video compression formatsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3gp, MPEG4

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More phone comparisons

All phone comparisons