Product comparison · 2 personal scales

Imetec Monitoring ES9 300 vs Philips Body analysis scale DL8781/15

12specifications compared
8differ
4identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Body analysis scale DL8781/15 has 200 g more accuracy than the Imetec Monitoring ES9 300 (300 g vs 100 g). The Philips Body analysis scale DL8781/15 has 3 more batteries supported than the Imetec Monitoring ES9 300 (4 vs 1). The Philips Body analysis scale DL8781/15 has 0.28 kg more weight than the Imetec Monitoring ES9 300 (1.98 kg vs 1.7 kg). Shape: Square on the Imetec Monitoring ES9 300, Rectangle on the Philips Body analysis scale DL8781/15. Product colour: Grey on the Imetec Monitoring ES9 300, White on the Philips Body analysis scale DL8781/15.

Accuracy
- Monitoring ES9 300:100 g
- Body analysis scale DL8781/15:300 g
Shape
- Monitoring ES9 300:Square
- Body analysis scale DL8781/15:Rectangle
Product colour
- Monitoring ES9 300:Grey
- Body analysis scale DL8781/15:White
Number of users
- Monitoring ES9 300:12 user(s)
- Body analysis scale DL8781/15:8 user(s)
Display size (HxV)
- Monitoring ES9 300:74 x 50 mm
- Body analysis scale DL8781/15:74 x 53 mm
Battery type
- Monitoring ES9 300:CR2032
- Body analysis scale DL8781/15:AAA
Number of batteries supported
- Monitoring ES9 300:1
- Body analysis scale DL8781/15:4
Weight
- Monitoring ES9 300:1.7 kg
- Body analysis scale DL8781/15:1.98 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Monitoring ES9 300, DL8781/15
37 specifications	A Imetec Monitoring ES9 300 View product	B Philips Body analysis scale DL8781/15 Model DL8781/15 View product
Performance4 differ
Minimum weight capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 kg
AccuracyDiffers	100 g	300 g
ShapeDiffers	Square	Rectangle
Product colourDiffers	Grey	White
Memory functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Body Mass Index (BMI) measuringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Body fat analysisKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) measuringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Number of usersDiffers	12 user(s)	8 user(s)
Automatic user recognitionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ready to useKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Sense-On technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Stand-alone usageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Large LCD displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Soft edgesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Auto power offKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Top surface typeKnown for one	Tempered glass	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multiple usersKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto power on functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display1 differ
Backlight displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Display size (HxV)Differs	74 x 50 mm	74 x 53 mm
Easy-to-read displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power2 differ
Battery typeDiffers	CR2032	AAA
Battery voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6 V
Number of batteries supportedDiffers	1	4
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	321 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	25 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	321 mm
WeightDiffers	1.7 kg	1.98 kg
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Alkaline
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Batteries includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More personal scale comparisons

All personal scale comparisons