Product comparison · 2 pcs/workstations

Lenovo ThinkCentre M55p Small Desktop (8808-9WG), SE vs Lenovo VTLD9GE ThinkCentre M55p Tower

81specifications compared
24differ
57identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

Processor model
- ThinkCentre M55p Small Desktop (8808-9WG), SE:E6300
- VTLD9GE ThinkCentre M55p Tower:E6320
Processor cache
- ThinkCentre M55p Small Desktop (8808-9WG), SE:2 MB
- VTLD9GE ThinkCentre M55p Tower:4 MB
Tcase
- ThinkCentre M55p Small Desktop (8808-9WG), SE:61.4 °C
- VTLD9GE ThinkCentre M55p Tower:60.1 °C
Number of Processing Die Transistors
- ThinkCentre M55p Small Desktop (8808-9WG), SE:167 M
- VTLD9GE ThinkCentre M55p Tower:291 M
Processing Die size
- ThinkCentre M55p Small Desktop (8808-9WG), SE:111 mm²
- VTLD9GE ThinkCentre M55p Tower:143 mm²
Stepping
- ThinkCentre M55p Small Desktop (8808-9WG), SE:R0
- VTLD9GE ThinkCentre M55p Tower:B2
Internal memory
- ThinkCentre M55p Small Desktop (8808-9WG), SE:1 GB
- VTLD9GE ThinkCentre M55p Tower:2 GB
Maximum internal memory
- ThinkCentre M55p Small Desktop (8808-9WG), SE:4 GB
- VTLD9GE ThinkCentre M55p Tower:8 GB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ThinkCentre M55p Small Desktop (8808-9WG), SE, VTLD9GE ThinkCentre M55p Tower
95 specifications	A Lenovo ThinkCentre M55p Small Desktop (8808-9WG), SE View product	B Lenovo VTLD9GE ThinkCentre M55p Tower View product
Processor6 differ
Processor manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Processor family	Intel® Core™2 Duo	Intel® Core™2 Duo
Processor modelDiffers	E6300	E6320
Processor cores	2	2
Processor threads	2	2
Processor frequency	1.86 GHz	1.86 GHz
Processor cacheDiffers	2 MB	4 MB
Processor cache type	L2	L2
Processor front side bus	1066 MHz	1066 MHz
Bus type	FSB	FSB
FSB Parity	No	No
Processor lithography	65 nm	65 nm
Processor operating modes	64-bit	64-bit
Processor codename	Conroe	Conroe
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 W	65 W
TcaseDiffers	61.4 °C	60.1 °C
Number of processors installedKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor socket	LGA 775 (Socket T)	LGA 775 (Socket T)
Number of Processing Die TransistorsDiffers	167 M	291 M
Processing Die sizeDiffers	111 mm²	143 mm²
CPU multiplier (bus/core ratio)	7	7
SteppingDiffers	R0	B2
ECC supported by processor	No	No
Processor seriesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Intel Core 2 Duo E6000 Series
Memory3 differ
Internal memoryDiffers	1 GB	2 GB
Maximum internal memoryDiffers	4 GB	8 GB
Internal memory type	DDR2-SDRAM	DDR2-SDRAM
Memory layout (slots x size)Differs	1 x 1 GB	2 x 1 GB
Storage2 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers	80 GB	160 GB
Optical drive typeKnown for one	DVD-ROM	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDD interface	SATA	SATA
HDD speedDiffers	7200 RPM	5400 RPM
Graphicsidentical
Discrete graphics card modelKnown for one	Intel® GMA 3000	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Product type	PC	PC
Password protection typeKnown for one	BIOS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Networking featuresDiffers	Gigabit Ethernet	Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers	8	10
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports	1	1
Headphone outputsDiffers	1	2
Line-outKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Line-inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Microphone in	Yes	Yes
Parallel ports quantity	1	1
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Expansion slots1 differ
Expansion slotsDiffers	1x PCI Express 1X (FH) 1x PCI (FH)	1(0) PCI Express 16X FH, 1(1) PCI Express 1X FH, 2(2) PCI FH
Power1 differ
Power supplyDiffers	225 W	310 W
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	115/230 V
Design1 differ
Chassis typeDiffers	Small Desktop	Tower
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	IBM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Software1 differ
Operating system installedDiffers	Windows XP Professional	Windows Vista Business
Bundled softwareKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Displayidentical
Display included	No	No
Processor special features2 differ
CPU configuration (max)Known for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Embedded options available	No	No
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology	Yes	Yes
Execute Disable Bit	Yes	Yes
Idle States	Yes	Yes
Intel 64	Yes	Yes
Intel Clear Video Technology	No	No
Intel Demand Based Switching	No	No
Intel Dual Display Capable Technology	No	No
Intel Enhanced Halt State	Yes	Yes
Intel FDI Technology	No	No
Intel Fast Memory Access	No	No
Intel Flex Memory Access	No	No
Intel Rapid Storage Technology	No	No
Intel Trusted Execution Technology	No	No
Intel VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)	No	No
Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x)	Yes	Yes
Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)	No	No
Intel® AES New Instructions (Intel® AES-NI)	No	No
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology (Intel® CVT HD)	No	No
Intel® Clear Video Technology for Mobile Internet Devices (Intel CVT for MID)	No	No
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology	No	No
Intel® Insider™	No	No
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi)	No	No
Processor ARK IDDiffers	27248	29754
Processor codeDiffers	SLGW2	SLA4U
Processor package size	37.5 x 37.5 mm	37.5 x 37.5 mm
Thermal Monitoring Technologies	Yes	Yes
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology	No	No
Intel® Hyper Threading Technology (Intel® HT Technology)	No	No
Intel® Quick Sync Video Technology	No	No
Intel® My WiFi Technology (Intel® MWT)	No	No
Intel® Anti-Theft Technology (Intel® AT)	No	No
Conflict-Free processor	No	No
Audioidentical
Audio system	ADI 1983 HD	ADI 1983 HD
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	310 mm	178 mm
DepthDiffers	87.5 mm	450 mm
HeightDiffers	358 mm	432 mm
WeightDiffers	8.5 kg	13.5 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Mouse included	Yes	Yes
Other featuresidentical
HDD user passwordKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Intel segment tagging	Enterprise, Professional	Enterprise, Professional

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pcs/workstations comparisons

All pcs/workstations comparisons