Product comparison · 2 pcs/workstations

HP 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i vs HP 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221

Add a product
  • 146specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 141identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

The HP 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i has 8° more viewing angle, horizontal than the HP 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221 (178° vs 170°). The HP 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i has 18° more viewing angle, vertical than the HP 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221 (178° vs 160°). Display diagonal: 48 cm (18.9") on the HP 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i, 54.6 cm (21.5") on the HP 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221. Display resolution: 1280 x 1024 pixels on the HP 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i, 1920 x 1080 pixels on the HP 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221. Native aspect ratio: 5:4 on the HP 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i, 16:9 on the HP 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221.

  • Display diagonal
    • 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i:48 cm (18.9")
    • 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221:54.6 cm (21.5")
  • Display resolution
    • 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221:1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Native aspect ratio
    • 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i:5:4
    • 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221:16:9
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i:178°
    • 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221:170°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i:178°
    • 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221:160°

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 800 G1 MT + EliteDisplay E190i, 800 G1 MT + ProDisplay P221
146 specifications
Display5 differ
Display diagonalDiffers48 cm (18.9")54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers5:416:9
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers178°170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers178°160°

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pcs/workstations comparisons

All pcs/workstations comparisons