All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 pcs/workstations

HP 6000 Pro SFF + CQ1859s vs HP 8000 Elite USFF + LE1901w

Add a product
  • 91specifications compared
  • 29differ
  • 62identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The HP 6000 Pro SFF + CQ1859s has 0.2 GHz more processor frequency than the HP 8000 Elite USFF + LE1901w (3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The HP 6000 Pro SFF + CQ1859s has 4 MB more processor cache than the HP 8000 Elite USFF + LE1901w (6 MB vs 2 MB). The HP 6000 Pro SFF + CQ1859s has 533 MHz more processor front side bus than the HP 8000 Elite USFF + LE1901w (1333 MHz vs 800 MHz). Only the HP 6000 Pro SFF + CQ1859s has card reader integrated. Only the HP 6000 Pro SFF + CQ1859s has embedded options available.

  • Processor family
    • Intel® Core™2 Duo
    • Intel® Pentium®
  • Processor model
    • E8400
    • E5500
  • Processor frequency
    • 3 GHz
    • 2.8 GHz
  • Processor cache
    • 6 MB
    • 2 MB
  • Processor cache type
    • L2
    • Smart Cache
  • Processor front side bus
    • 1333 MHz
    • 800 MHz
  • Tcase
    • 72.4 °C
    • 74.1 °C
  • Number of Processing Die Transistors
    • 410 M
    • 228 M

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
109 specifications
A

HP

6000 Pro SFF + CQ1859sView product
B

HP

8000 Elite USFF + LE1901wView product
Processor12 differ
Processor familyDiffersIntel® Core™2 DuoIntel® Pentium®
Processor modelDiffersE8400E5500
Processor frequencyDiffers3 GHz2.8 GHz
Processor cacheDiffers6 MB2 MB
Processor cache typeDiffersL2Smart Cache
Processor front side busDiffers1333 MHz800 MHz
Processor seriesDiffersIntel Core 2 Duo E8000 SeriesIntel Pentium E5000 Series for Desktop
TcaseDiffers72.4 °C74.1 °C
Number of Processing Die TransistorsDiffers410 M228 M
Processing Die sizeDiffers107 mm²82 mm²
CPU multiplier (bus/core ratio)Differs914
SteppingDiffersE0R0
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers3 GB2 GB
Maximum internal memoryKnown for one8 GB
Memory slotsKnown for one2x DIMM
Storage2 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers500 GB250 GB
Card reader integratedDiffersYesNo
Floppy drive installedKnown for oneNo
Graphicsidentical
On-board graphics cardKnown for oneYes
On-board graphics card modelKnown for oneNot available
Networkidentical
Networking featuresKnown for oneGigabit Ethernet
Ports & interfacesidentical
Serial ports quantityKnown for one1
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for oneSFF
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensington
Software1 differ
Operating system installedDiffersWindows Vista BusinessWindows 7 Professional
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers47 cm (18.5")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers1366 x 768 pixels1440 x 900 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for one16:9
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs600:11000:1
Display brightnessDiffers200 cd/m²250 cd/m²
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one160°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one160°
Processor special features5 differ
Embedded options availableDiffersYesNo
Graphics & IMC lithographyKnown for one45 nm
Intel Trusted Execution TechnologyDiffersYesNo
Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)DiffersYesNo
Processor ARK IDDiffers3391042800
Processor codeDiffersSLB9JSLGTJ
CPU configuration (max)Known for one1
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers337 mm251 mm
DepthDiffers378 mm254 mm
HeightDiffers100 mm66 mm
WeightDiffers7.26 kg3.07 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for oneNo
Other featuresidentical
TV tuner integratedKnown for oneNo
Poweridentical
Power supplyKnown for one135 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pcs/workstations comparisons

All pcs/workstations comparisons