ERAZER X5384 F vs MEDION P5029 D

Key differences

The ERAZER X5384 F has 0.2 GHz more processor boost frequency than the MEDION P5029 D (4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz). The ERAZER X5384 F has 0.6 GHz more processor frequency than the MEDION P5029 D (4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The ERAZER X5384 F has 26 W more thermal Design Power (TDP) than the MEDION P5029 D (91 W vs 65 W). Only the ERAZER X5384 F has DVI port. Only the MEDION P5029 D has embedded options available.

• Processor model
  • X5384 F:i7-6700K
  • P5029 D:i7-6700
• Processor boost frequency
  • X5384 F:4.2 GHz
  • P5029 D:4 GHz
• Processor frequency
  • X5384 F:4 GHz
  • P5029 D:3.4 GHz
• Bus type
  • X5384 F:DMI2
  • P5029 D:DMI3
• Thermal Design Power (TDP)
  • X5384 F:91 W
  • P5029 D:65 W
• Tcase
  • X5384 F:64 °C
  • P5029 D:71 °C
• PCI Express configurations
  • X5384 F:1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4
  • P5029 D:2x8, 1x8+2x4, 1x16
• Memory clock speeds supported by processor
  • X5384 F:1600,2133 MHz
  • P5029 D:1333,1600,1866,2133 MHz