Product comparison · 2 pcs/workstations

ERAZER X5383 F vs ERAZER X5384 F

137specifications compared
5differ
132identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

The ERAZER X5384 F has 16 GB more internal memory than the ERAZER X5383 F (32 GB vs 16 GB). The ERAZER X5384 F has 2 x 8 GB more memory layout (slots x size) than the ERAZER X5383 F (4 x 8 GB vs 2 x 8 GB). The ERAZER X5384 F has 1 TB more total storage capacity than the ERAZER X5383 F (3.51 TB vs 2.51 TB). Discrete graphics card model: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 980 on the ERAZER X5383 F, NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 980 Ti on the ERAZER X5384 F.

Internal memory
- X5383 F:16 GB
- X5384 F:32 GB
Memory layout (slots x size)
- X5383 F:2 x 8 GB
- X5384 F:4 x 8 GB
Total storage capacity
- X5383 F:2.51 TB
- X5384 F:3.51 TB
Discrete graphics card model
- X5383 F:NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 980
- X5384 F:NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 980 Ti
Discrete graphics card memory
- X5383 F:4 GB
- X5384 F:6 GB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of X5383 F, X5384 F
140 specifications	A ERAZER X5383 F View product	B ERAZER X5384 F View product
Memory2 differ
Internal memoryDiffers	16 GB	32 GB
Memory layout (slots x size)Differs	2 x 8 GB	4 x 8 GB
Storage1 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers	2.51 TB	3.51 TB
Graphics2 differ
Discrete graphics card modelDiffers	NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 980	NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 980 Ti
Discrete graphics card memoryDiffers	4 GB	6 GB
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
Thunderbolt 3 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pcs/workstations comparisons

All pcs/workstations comparisons