Product comparison · 2 pcs/workstations

ERAZER X5367 F vs ERAZER X5368 F

153specifications compared
8differ
145identical
2known for one product only

Key differences

Memory clock speed
- X5367 F:2133 MHz
- X5368 F:2000 MHz
Discrete graphics card model
- X5367 F:NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 970
- X5368 F:NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 980
CUDA cores
- X5367 F:1664
- X5368 F:2048
DisplayPorts quantity
- X5367 F:1
- X5368 F:3
Width
- X5367 F:250 mm
- X5368 F:280 mm
Depth
- X5367 F:610 mm
- X5368 F:555 mm
Height
- X5367 F:530 mm
- X5368 F:560 mm
Weight
- X5367 F:12 kg
- X5368 F:15 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of X5367 F, X5368 F
155 specifications	A ERAZER X5367 F View product	B ERAZER X5368 F View product
Memory1 differ
Memory clock speedDiffers	2133 MHz	2000 MHz
Storageidentical
Hot-swap drive baysKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Graphics2 differ
Discrete graphics card modelDiffers	NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 970	NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 980
CUDA coresDiffers	1664	2048
NVIDIA GameWorks VRKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
DisplayPorts quantityDiffers	1	3
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	250 mm	280 mm
DepthDiffers	610 mm	555 mm
HeightDiffers	530 mm	560 mm
WeightDiffers	12 kg	15 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pcs/workstations comparisons

All pcs/workstations comparisons