Product comparison · 2 pcs/workstations

Acer PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb vs Fujitsu SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105

16specifications compared
10differ
6identical
10known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb has 0.07 GHz more processor frequency than the Fujitsu SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105 (3 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Fujitsu SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105 has 0.5 GB more internal memory than the Acer PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb (1 GB vs 0.5 GB). The Fujitsu SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105 has 120 GB more total storage capacity than the Acer PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb (200 GB vs 80 GB). Discrete graphics card model: Intel® GMA 900 on the Acer PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb, AMD Radeon X300 SE on the Fujitsu SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105. Compatible operating systems: Microsoft Windows XP Professional on the Acer PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb, Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition on the Fujitsu SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105.

Processor frequency
- PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb:3 GHz
- SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105:2.93 GHz
Internal memory
- PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb:0.5 GB
- SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105:1 GB
Total storage capacity
- PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb:80 GB
- SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105:200 GB
Discrete graphics card model
- PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb:Intel® GMA 900
- SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105:AMD Radeon X300 SE
Width
- PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb:180 mm
- SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105:200 mm
Depth
- PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb:420 mm
- SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105:435 mm
Height
- PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb:360 mm
- SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105:373 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb, SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105
26 specifications	A Acer PC ACER AP FV Combo Intel530 XPP 256Mb View product	B Fujitsu SCALEO P P4 2.93GHZ PP 50105 View product
Processor1 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers	3 GHz	2.93 GHz
Processor front side busKnown for one	800 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers	0.5 GB	1 GB
Storage1 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers	80 GB	200 GB
Optical drive typeKnown for one	DVD-ROM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage drive typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Serial ATA
Graphics1 differ
Discrete graphics card modelDiffers	Intel® GMA 900	AMD Radeon X300 SE
Maximum graphics card memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.128 GB
Ports & interfaces1 differ
I/O portsDiffers	-Six USB 2.0 ports (two front, four rear) -PS2 keyboard and mouse ports -Ethernet (RJ-45) -Parallel port -Serial port -VGA Monitor port -Line-in and line-out jack -Headphone and microphone-in jack -Front Headphone and microphone jack	2x USB voor, 4x USB achter,Cardreader, FireWire
Poweridentical
Power supplyKnown for one	300 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Software2 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Microsoft Windows XP Professional	Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
Bundled softwareDiffers	-Norton AntiVirus 2004 -Adobe Reader 6.0 -Cyberlink PowerDVD with SuperMultiPlus, DVD / CD-RW, or DVD-ROM drive options -NTI CD-Maker Gold, with SuperMultiPlus or DVD / CD-RW drive options	MS Works, Nero, Win DVD
Displayidentical
DisplayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	180 mm	200 mm
DepthDiffers	420 mm	435 mm
HeightDiffers	360 mm	373 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12.5 kg
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	CE, GS (TUV), ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Security featuresKnown for one	Nemko, CE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Tower

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pcs/workstations comparisons

All pcs/workstations comparisons