All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 pcs/workstations

Acer Veriton M M670G Intel® Core™2 Quad Q9400 vs Acer Veriton M265 - Win7

Add a product
  • 105specifications compared
  • 37differ
  • 68identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer Veriton M M670G Intel® Core™2 Quad Q9400 has 2 more processor cores than the Acer Veriton M265 - Win7 (4 vs 2). The Acer Veriton M M670G Intel® Core™2 Quad Q9400 has 2 more processor threads than the Acer Veriton M265 - Win7 (4 vs 2). The Acer Veriton M265 - Win7 has 0.04 GHz more processor frequency than the Acer Veriton M M670G Intel® Core™2 Quad Q9400 (2.7 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). Only the Acer Veriton M M670G Intel® Core™2 Quad Q9400 has card reader integrated. Only the Acer Veriton M M670G Intel® Core™2 Quad Q9400 has DVI port.

  • Processor family
    • Intel® Core™2 Quad
    • Intel® Pentium®
  • Processor model
    • Q9400
    • E5400
  • Processor cores
    • 4
    • 2
  • Processor threads
    • 4
    • 2
  • Processor frequency
    • 2.66 GHz
    • 2.7 GHz
  • Processor cache
    • 6 MB
    • 2 MB
  • Processor front side bus
    • 1333 MHz
    • 800 MHz
  • Processor codename
    • Yorkfield
    • Wolfdale

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
111 specifications
A

Acer

Veriton M M670G Intel® Core™2 Quad Q9400

Model M670G

View product
B

Acer

Veriton M265 - Win7View product
Processor14 differ
Processor familyDiffersIntel® Core™2 QuadIntel® Pentium®
Processor modelDiffersQ9400E5400
Processor coresDiffers42
Processor threadsDiffers42
Processor frequencyDiffers2.66 GHz2.7 GHz
Processor cacheDiffers6 MB2 MB
Processor front side busDiffers1333 MHz800 MHz
Processor seriesDiffersIntel Core 2 Quad Q9000 Series for DesktopIntel Pentium E5000 Series for Desktop
Processor codenameDiffersYorkfieldWolfdale
Thermal Design Power (TDP)Differs95 W45, 65
TcaseDiffers71.4 °C74.1 °C
Number of Processing Die TransistorsDiffers456 M228 M
Processing Die sizeDiffers164 mm²82 mm²
CPU multiplier (bus/core ratio)Differs813.5
Memory4 differ
Internal memoryDiffers4 GB2 GB
Maximum internal memoryDiffers8 GB4 GB
Internal memory typeDiffersDDR3-SDRAMDDR2-SDRAM
Memory layout (slots x size)Differs2 x 2 GB1 x 2 GB
Storage3 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers640 GB160 GB
Optical drive typeDiffersDVD-RWDVD-ROM
Number of HDDs installedKnown for one2
Card reader integratedDiffersYesNo
Graphics1 differ
Discrete graphics card modelDiffersIntel® GMA 4500MIntel® GMA 3100
Ports & interfaces3 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers106
DVI portDiffersYesNo
Parallel ports quantityDiffers01
Expansion slotsidentical
PCI slotsKnown for one2
Power1 differ
Power supplyDiffers300 W250 W
Designidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensington
Software1 differ
Trial softwareDiffersMicrosoft Office 2007Microsoft Office 2007 Cyberlink PowerDVD
Processor special features6 differ
Embedded options availableDiffersYesNo
Intel Trusted Execution TechnologyDiffersYesNo
Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x)DiffersYes2
Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)DiffersYesNo
Processor ARK IDDiffers3536540478
Processor codeDiffersSLB6BSLGH7
CPU configuration (max)Known for one1
Audio1 differ
Audio systemDiffersHD Realtek ALC888S-VC2HD Realtek ALC888S
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DepthDiffers440 mm441.5 mm
HeightDiffers352 mm367 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Mouse includedKnown for oneYes
Certificates1 differ
CertificationDiffersENERGY STAR 5.0, CE, FCC, EPEAT, GS, UL, VCCI, CCCGS, CE, FCC, BSMI, CCC, ETL

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pcs/workstations comparisons

All pcs/workstations comparisons