All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 pcs/workstations

Acer Aspire M5641 vs Lenovo ThinkCentre M57e

Add a product
  • 80specifications compared
  • 32differ
  • 48identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer Aspire M5641 has 2 more processor cores than the Lenovo ThinkCentre M57e (4 vs 2). The Acer Aspire M5641 has 2 more processor threads than the Lenovo ThinkCentre M57e (4 vs 2). The Acer Aspire M5641 has 0.46 GHz more processor frequency than the Lenovo ThinkCentre M57e (2.66 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Only the Acer Aspire M5641 has card reader integrated. Only the Acer Aspire M5641 has embedded options available.

  • Processor family
    • Intel® Core™2 Quad
    • Intel® Pentium®
  • Processor model
    • Q9400
    • E2200
  • Processor cores
    • 4
    • 2
  • Processor threads
    • 4
    • 2
  • Processor frequency
    • 2.66 GHz
    • 2.2 GHz
  • Processor cache
    • 6 MB
    • 1 MB
  • Processor front side bus
    • 1333 MHz
    • 800 MHz
  • Processor lithography
    • 45 nm
    • 65 nm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
99 specifications
A

Acer

Aspire M5641View product
B

Lenovo

ThinkCentre M57eView product
Processor16 differ
Processor familyDiffersIntel® Core™2 QuadIntel® Pentium®
Processor modelDiffersQ9400E2200
Processor coresDiffers42
Processor threadsDiffers42
Processor frequencyDiffers2.66 GHz2.2 GHz
Processor cacheDiffers6 MB1 MB
Processor front side busDiffers1333 MHz800 MHz
Processor lithographyDiffers45 nm65 nm
Processor seriesDiffersIntel Core 2 Quad Q9000 Series for DesktopIntel Pentium E2000 Series for Desktop
Processor codenameDiffersYorkfieldConroe
Thermal Design Power (TDP)Differs95 W65 W
TcaseDiffers71.4 °C73.3 °C
Number of Processing Die TransistorsDiffers456 M105 M
Processing Die sizeDiffers164 mm²77 mm²
CPU multiplier (bus/core ratio)Differs811
SteppingDiffersR0M0
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers4 GB1 GB
Memory layout (slots x size)Known for one1 x 1 GB
Memory clock speedKnown for one667 MHz
Memory slotsKnown for one2x DIMM
Storage2 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers640 GB160 GB
Optical drive typeKnown for oneDVD-ROM
Card reader integratedDiffersYesNo
Number of HDDs installedKnown for one2
Graphics1 differ
Discrete graphics card modelDiffersNVIDIA® GeForce® 9600 GSIntel® GMA 3100
Maximum graphics card memoryKnown for one2.175 GB
Optical driveidentical
CD read speedKnown for one48x
CD write speedKnown for one48x
CD rewrite speedKnown for one32x
DVD read speedKnown for one16x
Networkidentical
Wake-on-LAN readyKnown for oneYes
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers86
Parallel ports quantityDiffers01
DVI portKnown for oneYes
Firewire (IEEE 1394) portsKnown for one1
Poweridentical
Power supplyKnown for one280 W
Power supply input voltageKnown for one110 - 220 V
Power supply input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 Hz
Software1 differ
Operating system installedDiffersWindows Vista Home PremiumWindows Vista Business
Processor special features5 differ
Embedded options availableDiffersYesNo
Intel Trusted Execution TechnologyDiffersYesNo
Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x)DiffersYesNo
Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)DiffersYesNo
Processor ARK IDDiffers3536533925
Processor codeKnown for oneSLB6B
Audio1 differ
Audio systemDiffersHigh Definition Audio 7.1ALC662
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers183 mm175 mm
DepthDiffers455 mm440 mm
HeightDiffers370 mm402 mm
WeightKnown for one11 kg
Other featuresidentical
Intel segment taggingKnown for oneEnterprise, Professional

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pcs/workstations comparisons

All pcs/workstations comparisons