Indesit IO 232H X vs Whirlpool Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB

Key differences

The Whirlpool Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB has 3 A more current than the Indesit IO 232H X (16 A vs 13 A). The Indesit IO 232H X has 0.29 kWh more energy consumption (conventional) than the Whirlpool Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB (0.81 kWh vs 0.52 kWh). The Whirlpool Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB has 0.73 kWh more energy consumption (forced convection) than the Indesit IO 232H X (0.73 kWh vs 0 kWh). Only the Whirlpool Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB has built-in display. Cleaning type: Hydrolytic on the Indesit IO 232H X, Hydrolytic + Pyrolytic on the Whirlpool Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB.

• Cleaning type
  • IO 232H X:Hydrolytic
  • Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB:Hydrolytic + Pyrolytic
• Control type
  • IO 232H X:Rotary
  • Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB:Rotary, Touch
• Built-in display
  • IO 232H X:No
  • Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB:Yes
• Timer type
  • IO 232H X:Mechanical
  • Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB:Digital
• Energy efficiency class
  • IO 232H X:A
  • Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB:A++
• AC input voltage
  • IO 232H X:220 - 240 V
  • Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB:220-240 V
• AC input frequency
  • IO 232H X:50/60 Hz
  • Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB:50 - 60 Hz
• Current
  • IO 232H X:13 A
  • Elements Steam OMSR58RU1SZB:16 A