Indesit IO 232H X vs Whirlpool OMSK58CU1SZB

Key differences

The Whirlpool OMSK58CU1SZB has 0.08 kWh more energy consumption (conventional) than the Indesit IO 232H X (0.89 kWh vs 0.81 kWh). The Whirlpool OMSK58CU1SZB has 0.69 kWh more energy consumption (forced convection) than the Indesit IO 232H X (0.69 kWh vs 0 kWh). The Whirlpool OMSK58CU1SZB has 19 mm more depth than the Indesit IO 232H X (570 mm vs 551 mm). Only the Whirlpool OMSK58CU1SZB has built-in display. Cleaning type: Hydrolytic on the Indesit IO 232H X, Catalytic on the Whirlpool OMSK58CU1SZB.

• Cleaning type
  • IO 232H X:Hydrolytic
  • OMSK58CU1SZB:Catalytic
• Built-in display
  • IO 232H X:No
  • OMSK58CU1SZB:Yes
• Energy efficiency class
  • IO 232H X:A
  • OMSK58CU1SZB:A+
• Energy consumption (conventional)
  • IO 232H X:0.81 kWh
  • OMSK58CU1SZB:0.89 kWh
• Energy consumption (forced convection)
  • IO 232H X:0 kWh
  • OMSK58CU1SZB:0.69 kWh
• Depth
  • IO 232H X:551 mm
  • OMSK58CU1SZB:570 mm
• Weight
  • IO 232H X:27.1 kg
  • OMSK58CU1SZB:26.9 kg