Candy F IDC X200 vs Whirlpool OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black

Key differences

The Whirlpool OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black has 1 L more total oven(s) interior capacity than the Candy F IDC X200 (71 L vs 70 L). The Whirlpool OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black has 1 L more oven net capacity than the Candy F IDC X200 (71 L vs 70 L). The Whirlpool OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black has 0.09 kWh more energy consumption (conventional) than the Candy F IDC X200 (0.89 kWh vs 0.8 kWh). Only the Candy F IDC X200 has steam cooking. Only the Whirlpool OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black has built-in display.

• Total oven(s) interior capacity
  • F IDC X200:70 L
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:71 L
• Oven net capacity
  • F IDC X200:70 L
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:71 L
• Steam cooking
  • F IDC X200:Yes
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:No
• Appliance placement
  • F IDC X200:Built-under (placement)
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:Built-in
• Product colour
  • F IDC X200:Stainless steel
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:Black
• Built-in display
  • F IDC X200:No
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:Yes
• Energy efficiency class
  • F IDC X200:A
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:A+
• Energy consumption (conventional)
  • F IDC X200:0.8 kWh
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:0.89 kWh