Beko BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White vs Whirlpool OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black

Key differences

The Whirlpool OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black has 0.37 kWh more energy consumption (conventional) than the Beko BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White (0.89 kWh vs 0.52 kWh). The Beko BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White has 0.04 kWh more energy consumption (forced convection) than the Whirlpool OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black (0.73 kWh vs 0.69 kWh). The Beko BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White has 19 mm more depth than the Whirlpool OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black (570 mm vs 551 mm). Only the Beko BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White has steam cooking. Product colour: White on the Beko BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White, Black on the Whirlpool OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black.

• Steam cooking
  • BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White:Yes
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:No
• Product colour
  • BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White:White
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:Black
• Energy efficiency class
  • BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White:A++
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:A+
• Energy consumption (conventional)
  • BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White:0.52 kWh
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:0.89 kWh
• Energy consumption (forced convection)
  • BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White:0.73 kWh
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:0.69 kWh
• Depth
  • BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White:570 mm
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:551 mm
• Weight
  • BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White:27.1 kg
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:26.9 kg
• Package weight
  • BBIS7301WP 71 L 3300 W White:28.4 kg
  • OMSK58CU1ZB 71 L Black:28.2 kg