Product comparison · 2 other input devices

Contour Design RollerMouse Pro2 vs Kensington Orbit Wireless Trac

6specifications compared
4differ
2identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

The Contour Design RollerMouse Pro2 has 5 more buttons quantity than the Kensington Orbit Wireless Trac (7 vs 2). Interface: USB on the Contour Design RollerMouse Pro2, Bluetooth/RF on the Kensington Orbit Wireless Trac. Movement detection technology: 1250 on the Contour Design RollerMouse Pro2, Optical on the Kensington Orbit Wireless Trac. Product colour: Black on the Contour Design RollerMouse Pro2, White on the Kensington Orbit Wireless Trac.

Interface
- RollerMouse Pro2:USB
- Orbit Wireless Trac:Bluetooth/RF
Buttons quantity
- RollerMouse Pro2:7
- Orbit Wireless Trac:2
Movement detection technology
- RollerMouse Pro2:1250
- Orbit Wireless Trac:Optical
Product colour
- RollerMouse Pro2:Black
- Orbit Wireless Trac:White

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of RollerMouse Pro2, Orbit Wireless Trac
29 specifications	A Contour Design RollerMouse Pro2 View product	B Kensington Orbit Wireless Trac View product
Features4 differ
Product typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Trackball
InterfaceDiffers	USB	Bluetooth/RF
Buttons quantityDiffers	7	2
Movement detection technologyDiffers	1250	Optical
Movement resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1600 DPI
Product colourDiffers	Black	White
Scroll	Yes	Yes
Wireless technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RF wireless 2.4 GHz/Bluetooth 3.0 LE
Wrist rest	Yes	Yes
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Microsoft Windows 8/7/Vista/XP/ME/98 Microsoft Windows 2008/2003/2000/NT 4.0 Apple OSX, Apple Mac OS 8.1 +	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	340 g
WidthKnown for one	510 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	90 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	32 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	154 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	133 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	370 g
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	83 mm
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84716070
Master (outer) case GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50085896709935
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.65 kg
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	330 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 mm
Quantity per boxKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More other input device comparisons

All other input device comparisons