Product comparison · 2 network transceiver modules

TP-Link DS-PMA-COMBO C+ vs TP-Link Omada 1000BASE-T RJ45 SFP Module SPEC: 1000Mbps RJ45 Copper Transceiver, Plug and Play with SFP Slot, Up to 100 m Distance (Cat5e or above)

9specifications compared
5differ
4identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

Maximum data transfer rate
- DS-PMA-COMBO C+:9953 Mbit/s
- Omada 1000BASE-T RJ45 SFP Module SPEC: 1000Mbps RJ45 Copper Transceiver, Plug and Play with SFP Slot, Up to 100 m Distance (Cat5e or above):1250 Mbit/s
Interface type
- DS-PMA-COMBO C+:SFP+
- Omada 1000BASE-T RJ45 SFP Module SPEC: 1000Mbps RJ45 Copper Transceiver, Plug and Play with SFP Slot, Up to 100 m Distance (Cat5e or above):SFP
Fiber cable diameters supported (core/cladding)
- DS-PMA-COMBO C+:9/125 µm
- Omada 1000BASE-T RJ45 SFP Module SPEC: 1000Mbps RJ45 Copper Transceiver, Plug and Play with SFP Slot, Up to 100 m Distance (Cat5e or above):50/125 µm
Maximum transfer distance
- DS-PMA-COMBO C+:20000 m
- Omada 1000BASE-T RJ45 SFP Module SPEC: 1000Mbps RJ45 Copper Transceiver, Plug and Play with SFP Slot, Up to 100 m Distance (Cat5e or above):300 m
Product colour
- DS-PMA-COMBO C+:Stainless steel
- Omada 1000BASE-T RJ45 SFP Module SPEC: 1000Mbps RJ45 Copper Transceiver, Plug and Play with SFP Slot, Up to 100 m Distance (Cat5e or above):Silver

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DS-PMA-COMBO C+, SM331T
33 specifications	A TP-Link DS-PMA-COMBO C+View product	B TP-Link Omada 1000BASE-T RJ45 SFP Module SPEC: 1000Mbps RJ45 Copper Transceiver, Plug and Play with SFP Slot, Up to 100 m Distance (Cat5e or above) Model SM331T View product
Performance4 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	9953 Mbit/s	1250 Mbit/s
Interface typeDiffers	SFP+	SFP
Multi-mode fiber (MMF) supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Fiber cable diameters supported (core/cladding)Differs	9/125 µm	50/125 µm
Maximum transfer distanceDiffers	20000 m	300 m
WavelengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	850 nm
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ethernet interface typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gigabit Ethernet
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.3ae
Single-mode fiber (SMF) supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fiber optic connectorKnown for one	SC/UPC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tx wavelength (max)Known for one	1490 nm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Rx wavelength (max)Known for one	1310 nm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fiber ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one	10GBASE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital Diagnostics Monitoring (DDM)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Stainless steel	Silver
Hot-swapKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC, CE
Operational conditionsidentical
Minimum operating temperatureKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 °C
Maximum operating temperatureKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	70 °C
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 70 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 80 °C
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	67.4 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	13.8 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	13.8 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	81.5 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	122.5 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	38.5 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network transceiver module comparisons

All network transceiver module comparisons