Product comparison · 2 network transceiver modules

Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM vs Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM)

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 17identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

The Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM) has 99,000 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM (100000 Mbit/s vs 1000 Mbit/s). The Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM has 450 m more maximum transfer distance than the Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM) (550 m vs 100 m). Interface type: SFP on the Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM, QSFP28 on the Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM). Fiber optic connector: LC on the Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM, MPO-12 on the Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM). Ethernet interface type: Gigabit Ethernet on the Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM, 100 Gigabit Ethernet on the Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM).

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM:1000 Mbit/s
    • X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):100000 Mbit/s
  • Interface type
    • ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM:SFP
    • X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):QSFP28
  • Fiber optic connector
    • ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM:LC
    • X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):MPO-12
  • Maximum transfer distance
    • ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM:550 m
    • X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):100 m
  • Ethernet interface type
    • ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM:Gigabit Ethernet
    • X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):100 Gigabit Ethernet

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM, X65404-OS
29 specifications
Performance5 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers1000 Mbit/s100000 Mbit/s
Interface typeDiffersSFPQSFP28
Fiber optic connectorDiffersLCMPO-12
Maximum transfer distanceDiffers550 m100 m
Ethernet interface typeDiffersGigabit Ethernet100 Gigabit Ethernet
Featuresidentical
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMetal
Brand compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNetApp
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.3 V
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceElectromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), REACH, RoHS, CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Sustainabilityidentical
Doesn't containKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLead
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTaiwan, China

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network transceiver module comparisons

All network transceiver module comparisons