Product comparison · 2 network transceiver modules

Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM vs Origin Storage Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 13identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

The Origin Storage Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T has 9,000 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM (10000 Mbit/s vs 1000 Mbit/s). The Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM has 520 m more maximum transfer distance than the Origin Storage Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T (550 m vs 30 m). SFP transceiver type: Fiber optic on the Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM, Copper on the Origin Storage Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T. Interface type: SFP on the Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM, SFP+ on the Origin Storage Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T. Fiber optic connector: LC on the Origin Storage ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM, RJ-45 on the Origin Storage Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T.

  • SFP transceiver type
    • ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM:Fiber optic
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T:Copper
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM:1000 Mbit/s
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T:10000 Mbit/s
  • Interface type
    • ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM:SFP
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T:SFP+
  • Fiber optic connector
    • ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM:LC
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T:RJ-45
  • Maximum transfer distance
    • ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM:550 m
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T:30 m
  • Ethernet interface type
    • ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM:Gigabit Ethernet
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP+ 100/1000/10000Base-T:10 Gigabit Ethernet

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ESGBIC35VSX Intel Compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-SX 850nm MMF 550m LC DOM, SFP-10GA-T-X-MSA-AT-OS
27 specifications
Performance6 differ
SFP transceiver typeDiffersFiber opticCopper
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers1000 Mbit/s10000 Mbit/s
Interface typeDiffersSFPSFP+
Fiber optic connectorDiffersLCRJ-45
Maximum transfer distanceDiffers550 m30 m
Ethernet interface typeDiffersGigabit Ethernet10 Gigabit Ethernet
Single-mode fiber (SMF) supportedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Multi-mode fiber (MMF) supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
WavelengthKnown for one850 nmUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMetal
Brand compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMSA Compliant
Sustainabilityidentical
Doesn't containKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLead
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 g
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina, Taiwan

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network transceiver module comparisons

All network transceiver module comparisons