Product comparison · 2 network transceiver modules

Origin Storage Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM) vs Origin Storage Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM)

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 17identical
  • 3known for one product only

Key differences

The Origin Storage Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM) has 15,000 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Origin Storage Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM) (25000 Mbit/s vs 10000 Mbit/s). The Origin Storage Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM) has 9,600 m more maximum transfer distance than the Origin Storage Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM) (10000 m vs 400 m). The Origin Storage Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM) has 460 nm more wavelength than the Origin Storage Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM) (1310 nm vs 850 nm). Only the Origin Storage Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM) has single-mode fiber (SMF) supported. Only the Origin Storage Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM) has multi-mode fiber (MMF) supported.

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM):10000 Mbit/s
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM):25000 Mbit/s
  • Interface type
    • Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM):SFP+
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM):SFP28
  • Single-mode fiber (SMF) supported
    • Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM):No
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM):Yes
  • Multi-mode fiber (MMF) supported
    • Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM):Yes
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM):No
  • Maximum transfer distance
    • Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM):400 m
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM):10000 m
  • Wavelength
    • Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM):850 nm
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM):1310 nm
  • Ethernet interface type
    • Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM):10 Gigabit Ethernet
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM):25 Gigabit Ethernet
  • Brand compatibility
    • Barox Compatible Transceiver SFP+ 10GBase-SR (850nm MMF 400m LC DOM):Barox
    • Universally Coded MSA compliant Transceiver SFP28 10/25GBase-LR (1310nm SMF 10km LC DOM):MSA Compliant

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AC-SFP+MM-E-0.082-OS, SFP-10/25G-LR-MSA-OS
28 specifications
Performance7 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers10000 Mbit/s25000 Mbit/s
Interface typeDiffersSFP+SFP28
Single-mode fiber (SMF) supportedDiffersNoYes
Multi-mode fiber (MMF) supportedDiffersYesNo
Maximum transfer distanceDiffers400 m10000 m
WavelengthDiffers850 nm1310 nm
Ethernet interface typeDiffers10 Gigabit Ethernet25 Gigabit Ethernet
Features1 differ
Brand compatibilityDiffersBaroxMSA Compliant
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.3 V
Sustainabilityidentical
Doesn't containKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLead
Logistics dataidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network transceiver module comparisons

All network transceiver module comparisons