Product comparison · 2 network transceiver modules

Origin Storage 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM) vs Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM)

Add a product
  • 23specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 18identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

The Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM) has 75,000 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Origin Storage 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM) (100000 Mbit/s vs 25000 Mbit/s). The Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM) has 75 Gigabit Ethernet more Ethernet interface type than the Origin Storage 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM) (100 Gigabit Ethernet vs 25 Gigabit Ethernet). Interface type: SFP28 on the Origin Storage 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM), QSFP28 on the Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM). Fiber optic connector: LC on the Origin Storage 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM), MPO-12 on the Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM). Brand compatibility: Cisco on the Origin Storage 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM), NetApp on the Origin Storage X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM).

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):25000 Mbit/s
    • X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):100000 Mbit/s
  • Interface type
    • 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):SFP28
    • X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):QSFP28
  • Fiber optic connector
    • 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):LC
    • X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):MPO-12
  • Ethernet interface type
    • 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):25 Gigabit Ethernet
    • X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):100 Gigabit Ethernet
  • Brand compatibility
    • 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):Cisco
    • X65404 NetApp compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM):NetApp

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 25G-SR-SFP100M Cisco Compatible Transceiver SFP28 25GBase-SR (850nm MMF 100m LC DOM), X65404-OS
29 specifications
Performance4 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers25000 Mbit/s100000 Mbit/s
Interface typeDiffersSFP28QSFP28
Fiber optic connectorDiffersLCMPO-12
Ethernet interface typeDiffers25 Gigabit Ethernet100 Gigabit Ethernet
Features1 differ
Brand compatibilityDiffersCiscoNetApp
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.3 V
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceElectromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), REACH, RoHS, CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Sustainabilityidentical
Doesn't containKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLead
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTaiwan, China
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network transceiver module comparisons

All network transceiver module comparisons