Product comparison · 2 network transceiver modules

Lanview MO-FTLF1318P3BTL network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm vs Lanview MO-MTB-LR network transceiver module Fiber optic 10000 Mbit/s SFP+ 1310 nm

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 18identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • MO-FTLF1318P3BTL network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:1000 Mbit/s
    • MO-MTB-LR network transceiver module Fiber optic 10000 Mbit/s SFP+ 1310 nm:10000 Mbit/s
  • Interface type
    • MO-FTLF1318P3BTL network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:SFP
    • MO-MTB-LR network transceiver module Fiber optic 10000 Mbit/s SFP+ 1310 nm:SFP+
  • Brand compatibility
    • MO-FTLF1318P3BTL network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:Finisar
    • MO-MTB-LR network transceiver module Fiber optic 10000 Mbit/s SFP+ 1310 nm:Planet
  • Compatible products
    • MO-FTLF1318P3BTL network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:Finisar
    • MO-MTB-LR network transceiver module Fiber optic 10000 Mbit/s SFP+ 1310 nm:Planet MTB-LR
  • Width
    • MO-FTLF1318P3BTL network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:12 mm
    • MO-MTB-LR network transceiver module Fiber optic 10000 Mbit/s SFP+ 1310 nm:16 mm
  • Height
    • MO-FTLF1318P3BTL network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:8.5 mm
    • MO-MTB-LR network transceiver module Fiber optic 10000 Mbit/s SFP+ 1310 nm:10 mm
  • Weight
    • MO-FTLF1318P3BTL network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:9 g
    • MO-MTB-LR network transceiver module Fiber optic 10000 Mbit/s SFP+ 1310 nm:40 g
  • Package weight
    • MO-FTLF1318P3BTL network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:10 g
    • MO-MTB-LR network transceiver module Fiber optic 10000 Mbit/s SFP+ 1310 nm:100 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of MO-FTLF1318P3BTL, MO-MTB-LR
36 specifications
Performance2 differ
SFP transceiver typeFiber opticFiber optic
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers1000 Mbit/s10000 Mbit/s
Interface typeDiffersSFPSFP+
Single-mode fiber (SMF) supportedYesYes
Multi-mode fiber (MMF) supportedNoNo
Fiber optic connectorLCLC
Fiber cable diameters supported (core/cladding)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9/125 µm
SFP transceiver standardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLR
Maximum transfer distance10000 m10000 m
Wavelength1310 nm1310 nm
Ethernet interface typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 Gigabit Ethernet
Cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000/10000
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10GBASE
Fiber ethernet cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10GBASE
Duplex systemFullFull
Digital Diagnostics Monitoring (DDM)YesYes
Fiber ports quantity11
Features2 differ
Form factorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSFP+
Plug and PlayYesYes
Easy to installYesYes
Brand compatibilityDiffersFinisarPlanet
Compatible productsDiffersFinisarPlanet MTB-LR
Certificatesidentical
CertificationMSAMSA
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)-45 - 75 °C-45 - 75 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-40 - 85 °C-40 - 85 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)10 - 85%10 - 85%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers12 mm16 mm
Depth56 mm56 mm
HeightDiffers8.5 mm10 mm
WeightDiffers9 g40 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source105 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source98 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source23 mm
Package weightDiffers10 g100 g
Package typeWindow boxWindow box

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network transceiver module comparisons

All network transceiver module comparisons