Product comparison · 2 network transceiver modules

InLine 32336E network transceiver module Fiber optic 100000 Mbit/s QSFP28 850 nm vs SilverNet SIL-QSFP28-X131-10XD network transceiver module Fiber optic 100000 Mbit/s 1310 nm

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 4identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The SilverNet SIL-QSFP28-X131-10XD network transceiver module Fiber optic 100000 Mbit/s 1310 nm has 460 nm more wavelength than the InLine 32336E network transceiver module Fiber optic 100000 Mbit/s QSFP28 850 nm (1310 nm vs 850 nm). Fiber optic connector: MPO-12 on the InLine 32336E network transceiver module Fiber optic 100000 Mbit/s QSFP28 850 nm, LC on the SilverNet SIL-QSFP28-X131-10XD network transceiver module Fiber optic 100000 Mbit/s 1310 nm.

  • Fiber optic connector
    • 32336E network transceiver module Fiber optic 100000 Mbit/s QSFP28 850 nm:MPO-12
    • SIL-QSFP28-X131-10XD network transceiver module Fiber optic 100000 Mbit/s 1310 nm:LC
  • Wavelength
    • 32336E network transceiver module Fiber optic 100000 Mbit/s QSFP28 850 nm:850 nm
    • SIL-QSFP28-X131-10XD network transceiver module Fiber optic 100000 Mbit/s 1310 nm:1310 nm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 32336E, SIL-QSFP28-X131-10XD
34 specifications
Performance2 differ
SFP transceiver typeFiber opticFiber optic
Maximum data transfer rate100000 Mbit/s100000 Mbit/s
Interface typeQSFP28QSFP28
Multi-mode fiber (MMF) supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Fiber optic connectorDiffersMPO-12LC
SFP transceiver standardKnown for oneSR4Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum transfer distanceKnown for one100 mUnknown — not stated by the source
WavelengthDiffers850 nm1310 nm
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.3bmUnknown — not stated by the source
Fiber ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one100GBASEUnknown — not stated by the source
Digital Diagnostics Monitoring (DDM)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Single-mode fiber (SMF) supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Featuresidentical
Hot-Plug supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Brand compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMSA Compliant
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one3.3 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one2.5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneTÜV mark, CEUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRoHS
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 70 °C0 - 70 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 85 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 95%
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one124 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one0.49 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one19 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one1.1 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one53 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one160 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one20 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package volumeKnown for one200 cm³Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one36 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one124 x 0.49 x 19 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Logistics dataidentical
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176200
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network transceiver module comparisons

All network transceiver module comparisons