Product comparison · 2 network transceiver modules

ATGBICS SFP-GLS-W3520A-A KTI Networks compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-BX-U (Tx1310nm/Rx1550nm SMF 20km LC DOM Ind Temp) vs ATGBICS SFPMYS20M EtherWAN compatible Transceiver SFP 100Base-BX-U (Tx1310nm/Rx1550nm SMF 20km LC DOM Ind Temp)

Add a product
  • 31specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 27identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • SFP-GLS-W3520A-A KTI Networks compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-BX-U (Tx1310nm/Rx1550nm SMF 20km LC DOM Ind Temp):1000 Mbit/s
    • SFPMYS20M EtherWAN compatible Transceiver SFP 100Base-BX-U (Tx1310nm/Rx1550nm SMF 20km LC DOM Ind Temp):100 Mbit/s
  • Ethernet interface type
    • SFP-GLS-W3520A-A KTI Networks compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-BX-U (Tx1310nm/Rx1550nm SMF 20km LC DOM Ind Temp):Gigabit Ethernet
    • SFPMYS20M EtherWAN compatible Transceiver SFP 100Base-BX-U (Tx1310nm/Rx1550nm SMF 20km LC DOM Ind Temp):Fast Ethernet
  • Fiber ethernet cabling technology
    • SFP-GLS-W3520A-A KTI Networks compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-BX-U (Tx1310nm/Rx1550nm SMF 20km LC DOM Ind Temp):1000BASE
    • SFPMYS20M EtherWAN compatible Transceiver SFP 100Base-BX-U (Tx1310nm/Rx1550nm SMF 20km LC DOM Ind Temp):100BASE
  • Brand compatibility
    • SFP-GLS-W3520A-A KTI Networks compatible Transceiver SFP 1000Base-BX-U (Tx1310nm/Rx1550nm SMF 20km LC DOM Ind Temp):KTI Networks
    • SFPMYS20M EtherWAN compatible Transceiver SFP 100Base-BX-U (Tx1310nm/Rx1550nm SMF 20km LC DOM Ind Temp):EtherWAN

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of SFP-GLS-W3520A-A-C, SFPMYS20M-C
31 specifications
Performance3 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers1000 Mbit/s100 Mbit/s
Ethernet interface typeDiffersGigabit EthernetFast Ethernet
Fiber ethernet cabling technologyDiffers1000BASE100BASE
Features1 differ
Brand compatibilityDiffersKTI NetworksEtherWAN

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network transceiver module comparisons

All network transceiver module comparisons