Product comparison · 2 network switches

NETGEAR ProSafe FS752TS vs NETGEAR ProSafe™ 48-port Gigabit Smart Switch

11specifications compared
7differ
4identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

Maximum data transfer rate
- ProSafe FS752TS:12.8 Gbit/s
- ProSafe™ 48-port Gigabit Smart Switch:1 Gbit/s
Power consumption (typical)
- ProSafe FS752TS:22.3 W
- ProSafe™ 48-port Gigabit Smart Switch:70 W
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- ProSafe FS752TS:440 x 257 x 43.2 mm
- ProSafe™ 48-port Gigabit Smart Switch:440 x 260 x 43 mm
Power requirements
- ProSafe FS752TS:100-240VAC/50-60Hz
- ProSafe™ 48-port Gigabit Smart Switch:100-240VAC 50/60 Hz
Storage temperature (T-T)
- ProSafe FS752TS:-20 - 70 °C
- ProSafe™ 48-port Gigabit Smart Switch:-10 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- ProSafe FS752TS:0 - 90%
- ProSafe™ 48-port Gigabit Smart Switch:10 - 90%
Weight
- ProSafe FS752TS:2.98 kg
- ProSafe™ 48-port Gigabit Smart Switch:4 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ProSafe FS752TS, ProSafe™ 48-port Gigabit Smart Switch
31 specifications	A NETGEAR ProSafe FS752TS View product	B NETGEAR ProSafe™ 48-port Gigabit Smart Switch View product
Ports & interfacesidentical
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity	48	48
Networkidentical
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.3x
Full duplex	Yes	Yes
Data transmission1 differ
MAC address tableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16000 entries
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	12.8 Gbit/s	1 Gbit/s
Packet buffer memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.632 MB
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Link, Power
SafetyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	UL listed (UL 1950)/cUL, IEC950/EN60950
StackableKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	69930 h
Minimum system requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Category 5 network cables Network card for each PC Network software (e.g., Windows)
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	22.3 W	70 W
Other features2 differ
LatencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 µs
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	440 x 257 x 43.2 mm	440 x 260 x 43 mm
Connectivity technology	Wired	Wired
Networking featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 1000BASE-T
Power requirementsDiffers	100-240VAC/50-60Hz	100-240VAC 50/60 Hz
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC Part 15 Class A, VCCI Class A, EN 55022 (CISPR 22), Class A, EN 50082-1, EN 55024, C-Tick, CE mark, commercial
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48 RJ-45 connectors for 10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, and 1000BASE-T (Auto Uplink on all ports) 4 SFP slots for fiber Gigabit Ethernet modules
Data transfer rateKnown for one	10 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
BandwidthKnown for one	0 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connectivity LEDsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (W x D x H) (imperial)Known for one	43.2 x 257 x 439.9 mm (1.7 x 10.1 x 17.3")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (imperial)Known for one	2.98 kg (6.57 lbs)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)	0 - 40 °C	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-20 - 70 °C	-10 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	0 - 90%	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	2.98 kg	4 kg
Management featuresidentical
Switch typeKnown for one	Managed	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power over Ethernet (PoE)identical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons