Product comparison · 2 network switches

NETGEAR GS716TNA network switch vs NETGEAR ProSafe™ 8 Port Gigabit Desktop Switch

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 5identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

  • Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity
    • GS716TNA network switch:16
    • ProSafe™ 8 Port Gigabit Desktop Switch:8
  • Switching capacity
    • GS716TNA network switch:32 Gbit/s
    • ProSafe™ 8 Port Gigabit Desktop Switch:16 Gbit/s
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • GS716TNA network switch:0.1 Gbit/s
    • ProSafe™ 8 Port Gigabit Desktop Switch:1 Gbit/s
  • Packet buffer memory
    • GS716TNA network switch:0.256 MB
    • ProSafe™ 8 Port Gigabit Desktop Switch:0.032 MB
  • Safety
    • GS716TNA network switch:CE mark, cUL 60950/EN60950
    • ProSafe™ 8 Port Gigabit Desktop Switch:UL (UL 1950), CUL, C-Tick
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • GS716TNA network switch:440 x 205 x 43 mm
    • ProSafe™ 8 Port Gigabit Desktop Switch:235.5 x 100.8 x 27 mm
  • Weight
    • GS716TNA network switch:2.74 kg
    • ProSafe™ 8 Port Gigabit Desktop Switch:760 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of GS716TNA, ProSafe™ 8 Port Gigabit Desktop Switch
29 specifications
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityDiffers168
Network1 differ
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3ad, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3zIEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3i, IEEE 802.3u
Copper ethernet cabling technology1000BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T1000BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T
Full duplexYesYes
Data transmission3 differ
MAC address table8000 entries8000 entries
Switching capacityDiffers32 Gbit/s16 Gbit/s
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers0.1 Gbit/s1 Gbit/s
Packet buffer memoryDiffers0.256 MB0.032 MB
Protocols1 differ
Data link protocolsDiffersEthernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit EthernetEthernet,Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet
Management protocolsKnown for oneSNMP v1, STP, DHCPUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
LED indicatorsPowerPower
SafetyDiffersCE mark, cUL 60950/EN60950UL (UL 1950), CUL, C-Tick
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows, Linux, Mac OS
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source- UTP Category 5 or better cables -Network card for each PC or server (e.g. GA302T) -Network software
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one65789 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source14 W
Other features4 differ
LatencyDiffers<20µs for 64-byte frames(100 to 100 Mbps): 40 µ (max), (1000 to 1000 Mbps): 10 µ (max)
Data transfer rate1000 Mbit/s1000 Mbit/s
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs440 x 205 x 43 mm235.5 x 100.8 x 27 mm
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V @ 2.8 A DC
Acoustic pressure emissionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 dB
Electromagnetic emissionsDiffersCE mark, FCC Part 15 Class A, VCCI Class A, C-TickCE mark, commercial FCC Part 15 Class A, EN 55 022 (CISPR 22), Class A VCCI, Class A C-Tick
I/O portsDiffers16x 10/100/1000 Ethernet 2x SFP slot 1x Power8 auto speed(10/100/1000) sensing UTP RJ-45
Management platformKnown for oneWeb-basedUnknown — not stated by the source
Security featuresKnown for onePassword Access ControlUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical featuresKnown for oneClass of Service (CoS) Port-based QoS Link Aggregation RFC 1213 MIB II RFC 1643 Ethernet Interface MIB RFC 1493 Bridge MIB RFC 2131 DHCP client Jumbo Frame Port Mirroring Firmware upgradeableUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers2.74 kg760 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons