Product comparison · 2 network switches

NETGEAR 48-Port Switch + 2 Gigabit Ports vs NETGEAR JFS524 Unmanaged Fast Ethernet (10/100) 1U Black

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 3identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 48-Port Switch + 2 Gigabit Ports:40 W
    • JFS524 Unmanaged Fast Ethernet (10/100) 1U Black:15 W
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • 48-Port Switch + 2 Gigabit Ports:10 - 90%
    • JFS524 Unmanaged Fast Ethernet (10/100) 1U Black:0 - 80%
  • Weight
    • 48-Port Switch + 2 Gigabit Ports:3.2 kg
    • JFS524 Unmanaged Fast Ethernet (10/100) 1U Black:2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 48-Port Switch + 2 Gigabit Ports, JFS524
36 specifications
Management featuresidentical
Switch typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUnmanaged
Ports & interfacesidentical
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFast Ethernet (10/100)
Networkidentical
Networking standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.3i, IEEE 802.3u
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T
Full duplexYesYes
Half duplexKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Data transmissionidentical
MAC address table4000 entries4000 entries
Store-and-forwardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Packet forwarding rate (10 Mbps)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source14800 pps
Packet forwarding rate (100 Mbps)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source148000 pps
Packet buffer memoryKnown for one0.512 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Rack mountingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Form factorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1U
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
SafetyDiffersUL listed (UL 1950)/cUL, IEC950/EN60950UL listed (UL 1950)/CUL
Performanceidentical
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110000 h
Minimum system requirementsKnown for one- Category 5 network cables - Network card for each PC - Network software (e.g., Windows)Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power sourceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50/60 Hz
Power consumption (typical)Differs40 W15 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)identical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Other features1 differ
LatencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 µ
Power requirementsDiffers100-240VAC/50-60 Hz universal input100 to 240V, 50/60 Hz
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE mark, FCC Part 15 Class, EN 55 022 (CISPR 22), Class A, VCCI Class A, C-Tick, MIC
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one43 x 440 x 205 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
I/O portsKnown for one- 48 10/100 Mbps auto sensing Fast Ethernet switching ports - 2 built-in RJ-45 Gigabit Ethernet ports for 10/100/1000 Mbps connectivityUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one0 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%0 - 80%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-10 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source330 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source202 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source43 mm
WeightDiffers3.2 kg2 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons