Product comparison · 2 network switches

HP ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black vs HP 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX

Add a product
  • 39specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 24identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

The HP 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX has 8,000 entries more MAC address table than the HP ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black (16000 entries vs 8000 entries). The HP 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX has 1.488 MB more packet buffer memory than the HP ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black (2 MB vs 0.512 MB). The HP 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX has 100 MHz more processor frequency than the HP ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black (400 MHz vs 300 MHz). Switch layer: L2 on the HP ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black, L3 on the HP 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX. Product colour: Black on the HP ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black, Silver on the HP 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX.

  • Switch layer
    • ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black:L2
    • 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX:L3
  • MAC address table
    • ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black:8000 entries
    • 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX:16000 entries
  • Packet buffer memory
    • ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black:0.512 MB
    • 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX:2 MB
  • Product colour
    • ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black:Black
    • 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX:Silver
  • Processor model
    • ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black:MIPS
    • 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX:PowerPC MPC8313
  • Processor frequency
    • ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black:300 MHz
    • 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX:400 MHz
  • Internal memory
    • ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black:128 MB
    • 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX:512 MB
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • ProCurve 2510-48 Managed L2 1U Black:27 W
    • 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX:34.4 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 2510-48, 2620-48 + X121 1G SFP LC SX
49 specifications
Management features1 differ
Switch layerDiffersL2L3
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Console portKnown for oneRJ-45Unknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1s, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3ad, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3xIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u
Link aggregationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Data transmission2 differ
MAC address tableDiffers8000 entries16000 entries
Packet buffer memoryDiffers0.512 MB2 MB
Jumbo frames supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Securityidentical
DHCP featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDHCP client
Access Control List (ACL)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
MAC address filteringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Protocols1 differ
Management protocolsDiffersSNMP 1, RMON, SNMP 3, SNMP 2c, HTTPSNMP 1, RMON 1, RMON 2, RMON 3, RMON 9, Telnet, SNMP 3, SNMP 2c, HTTP, HTTPS, TFTP, SMON, CLI
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackSilver
SafetyKnown for onecUL (CSA 22.2 No. 60950); UL 60950-1; IEC 60950; EN 60950Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance3 differ
Processor modelDiffersMIPSPowerPC MPC8313
Processor frequencyDiffers300 MHz400 MHz
Internal memoryDiffers128 MB512 MB
Flash memoryKnown for one16 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36.5 dB
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs27 W34.4 W
Other features2 differ
LatencyDiffers100 Mb Latency: < 4.9 µs (64-byte packets); 1000 Mb Latency: < 2.9 µs (64-byte packets)100 Mb Latency: < 8.3 µs (LIFO); 1000 Mb Latency: < 2.9 µs (LIFO)
Authentication methodDiffersRADIUS, TACACS+RADIUS, TACACS+, Secure Shell v.2 (SSH2)
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers442.5 mm443 mm
DepthDiffers236.2 mm254 mm
WeightDiffers2.74 kg2.94 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons