Product comparison · 2 network switches

HP 1820-48G-PoE+ (370W) vs HP 1820-8G Managed L2 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) 1U Grey

50specifications compared
10differ
40identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity
- 1820-48G-PoE+ (370W):48
- 1820-8G Managed L2 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) 1U Grey:8
MAC address table
- 1820-48G-PoE+ (370W):16000 entries
- 1820-8G Managed L2 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) 1U Grey:8000 entries
Switching capacity
- 1820-48G-PoE+ (370W):104 Gbit/s
- 1820-8G Managed L2 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) 1U Grey:16 Gbit/s
Throughput
- 1820-48G-PoE+ (370W):77.3 Mpps
- 1820-8G Managed L2 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) 1U Grey:11.9 Mpps
AC input voltage
- 1820-48G-PoE+ (370W):100 - 240 V
- 1820-8G Managed L2 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) 1U Grey:100 - 127 V
Power consumption (typical)
- 1820-48G-PoE+ (370W):481 W
- 1820-8G Managed L2 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) 1U Grey:12.2 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
- 1820-48G-PoE+ (370W):Yes
- 1820-8G Managed L2 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) 1U Grey:No
Width
- 1820-48G-PoE+ (370W):442.5 mm
- 1820-8G Managed L2 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) 1U Grey:254 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 1820-48G-PoE+ (370W), 1820-8G
54 specifications	A HP 1820-48G-PoE+ (370W)View product	B HP 1820-8G Managed L2 Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000) 1U Grey Model 1820-8G View product
Management featuresidentical
Switch type	Managed	Managed
Switch layer	L2	L2
Quality of Service (QoS) support	Yes	Yes
Web-based management	Yes	Yes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityDiffers	48	8
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports type	Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000)	Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000)
SFP module slots quantityKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Installed SFP modules quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
Installed SFP+ modules quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
Networkidentical
Networking standards	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u
10G support	No	No
Copper ethernet cabling technology	10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 1000BASE-T	10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 1000BASE-T
Port mirroring	Yes	Yes
Full duplex	Yes	Yes
Auto MDI/MDI-X	Yes	Yes
Auto-sensing	Yes	Yes
Flow control support	Yes	Yes
Link aggregation	Yes	Yes
Spanning tree protocol	Yes	Yes
VLAN support	Yes	Yes
Data transmission3 differ
MAC address tableDiffers	16000 entries	8000 entries
Switching capacityDiffers	104 Gbit/s	16 Gbit/s
ThroughputDiffers	77.3 Mpps	11.9 Mpps
Latency (10-100 Mbps)	7 µs	7 µs
Latency (1 Gbps)	2 µs	2 µs
Jumbo frames support	Yes	Yes
Packet buffer memory	1.5 MB	1.5 MB
Securityidentical
DHCP features	DHCP client	DHCP client
IGMP snooping	Yes	Yes
SSH/SSL support	Yes	Yes
Designidentical
Rack mounting	Yes	Yes
Stackable	Yes	Yes
Form factor	1U	1U
Product colour	Grey	Grey
Performanceidentical
Built-in processor	Yes	Yes
Processor model	ARM Cortex-A9	ARM Cortex-A9
Processor frequency	400 MHz	400 MHz
Memory type	SDRAM	SDRAM
Internal memory	128 MB	128 MB
Flash memory	16 MB	16 MB
Power2 differ
AC input voltageDiffers	100 - 240 V	100 - 127 V
AC input frequency	50 - 60 Hz	50 - 60 Hz
Power consumption (typical)Differs	481 W	12.2 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)1 differ
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Differs	Yes	No
Total Power over Ethernet (PoE) budgetKnown for one	370 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)	0 - 40 °C	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)	-40 - 70 °C	-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)	15 - 95%	15 - 95%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)	15 - 95%	15 - 95%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	442.5 mm	254 mm
DepthDiffers	322.6 mm	159.5 mm
Height	43.9 mm	43.9 mm
WeightDiffers	4.4 kg	820 g
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificates	ENERGY STAR	ENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons