Product comparison · 2 network switches

Buffalo LSW3-TX-5EP/W network switch White vs Zyxel PLA4225 network switch White

10specifications compared
5differ
5identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity
- LSW3-TX-5EP/W network switch White:5
- PLA4225 network switch White:4
Supported data transfer rates
- LSW3-TX-5EP/W network switch White:10/100 Mbps
- PLA4225 network switch White:10/100/1000 Mbps
Maximum data transfer rate
- LSW3-TX-5EP/W network switch White:0.1 Gbit/s
- PLA4225 network switch White:1 Gbit/s
Power consumption (typical)
- LSW3-TX-5EP/W network switch White:2.6 W
- PLA4225 network switch White:5 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of LSW3-TX-5EP/W, PLA4225
35 specifications	A Buffalo LSW3-TX-5EP/W network switch White Model LSW3-TX-5EP/W View product	B Zyxel PLA4225 network switch White Model PLA4225 View product
Management featuresidentical
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityDiffers	5	4
Power connectorKnown for one	DC-in jack	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Networking standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u	Unknown — not stated by the source
10G supportKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one	100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transmission2 differ
Supported data transfer ratesDiffers	10/100 Mbps	10/100/1000 Mbps
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	0.1 Gbit/s	1 Gbit/s
Securityidentical
IGMP snoopingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Security algorithmsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	128-bit AES
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Link, Power
SafetyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE-LVD
Rack mountingKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 7 (32/64-bit) Windows Vista (32/64-bit) Windows XP Windows 2000 Windows Me, Windows 98 Mac OS X, Mac OS 9, Mac OS 8.6	Windows XP/Vista/7
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	2.6 W	5 W
Other featuresidentical
Data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	500 Mbit/s
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	76 x 72 x 108 mm
Dimensions (W x D x H) (imperial)Known for one	111.8 x 71.1 x 30.5 mm (4.4 x 2.8 x 1.2")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 95%
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LAN (RJ-45)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	134 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	94 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	178 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	419 g
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, FCC
Power over Ethernet (PoE)identical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons