Product comparison · 2 network switches

ASUS GigaX 1024P vs D-Link 48-Port xStack Layer 3 Switch

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 5identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

  • Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity
    • GigaX 1024P:26
    • 48-Port xStack Layer 3 Switch:48
  • MAC address table
    • GigaX 1024P:8000 entries
    • 48-Port xStack Layer 3 Switch:16000 entries
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • GigaX 1024P:0.1 Gbit/s
    • 48-Port xStack Layer 3 Switch:1 Gbit/s
  • Safety
    • GigaX 1024P:UL1950, TUV
    • 48-Port xStack Layer 3 Switch:CSA International, CB Report
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • GigaX 1024P:15 W
    • 48-Port xStack Layer 3 Switch:47 W
  • Power over Ethernet (PoE)
    • GigaX 1024P:Yes
    • 48-Port xStack Layer 3 Switch:No
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • GigaX 1024P:-10 - 50 °C
    • 48-Port xStack Layer 3 Switch:0 - 40 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • GigaX 1024P:0 - 90%
    • 48-Port xStack Layer 3 Switch:10 - 85%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of GigaX 1024P, 48-Port xStack Layer 3 Switch
29 specifications
Management featuresidentical
Switch typeManagedManaged
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityDiffers2648
Network1 differ
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3xIEEE 802.1d, IEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1q, IEEE 802.1w, IEEE 802.1x, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3ad, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3z
Copper ethernet cabling technology1000Base-T, 100Base-TX, 10Base-T1000Base-T, 100Base-TX, 10Base-T
Data transmission2 differ
MAC address tableDiffers8000 entries16000 entries
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers0.1 Gbit/s1 Gbit/s
Switching capacityKnown for one8.8 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
Management protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTelnet, RMON, HTTP, SNMPv1/v2/v3, IGMPv1/2, IGMPv31, DVMRP, STP, GVRP
Data link protocolsEthernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit EthernetEthernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRFC 1157 SNMP, RFC 1112/2236 IGMPv1/2 IGMPv3, RFC 1757/2021/2819 RMON (4 Groups), RFC 1493 Bridge MIB, RFC 1213 MIB II, RFC 793 TCP, RFC 826 ARP, RFC 854 Telnet, & DiffServ, RFC 1724 RIP v1/2, RFC 1850 OSPF, DVMRP, RFC 2934 PIM-DM, PIM-SM, RFC 2932 Multicast Routing, RFC 2787 VRRP, RFC 2096 IP Forwa
Design1 differ
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePower
SafetyDiffersUL1950, TUVCSA International, CB Report
Rack mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs15 W47 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)1 differ
Power over Ethernet (PoE)DiffersYesNo
Other features1 differ
Management platformKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWeb/CLI/SNMP
Data transfer rate1000 Mbit/s1000 Mbit/s
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source338.8 x 440.9 x 43.9 mm
BandwidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source17.6 Gbit/s
Electromagnetic emissionsDiffersFCC Part 15, Class A; CE MarkCE Class A, FCC Class A, VCCI Class A, C-Tick Class A
I/O portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48x 10/100 Ethernet 2x Combo SFP/1000BASE-T 2x 1000BASE-T Uplinks 1x Power
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneWiredUnknown — not stated by the source
Packet transfer speedKnown for one6.6 MppsUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one100-240VAC, 50/60HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs-10 - 50 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-40 - 70 °C-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs0 - 90%10 - 85%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 95%
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.9 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons